Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 3 months ago

Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court in Harpal Singh @ Chhota Vs. State Of Punjab, has reiterated that any electronic record in the form of secondary evidence cannot be admitted in evidence unless a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act is produced.In the instant case, the prosecution had produced printed copy of the computer generated call details kept in usual ordinary course of business. The Supreme Court in Harpal Singh @ Chhota Vs. State Of Punjab, has reiterated that any electronic record in the form of secondary evidence cannot be admitted in evidence unless a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act is produced. Basheer and others, observed that as the prosecution had relied upon secondary evidence in the form of printed copy of the call details, even assuming that the mandate of Section 65B had been complied with, in absence of a certificate under Section 65B, the same has to be held inadmissible in evidence. Thus, in the case of CD, VCD, chip, etc., the same shall be accompanied by the certificate in terms of Section 65B obtained at the time of taking the document, without which, the secondary evidence pertaining to that electronic record, is inadmissible.” Read the judgment and report here.

History of this topic

S. 65-B Of Indian Evidence Act Only Pertains To Production Of Electronic Records, Not Physical Documents: Jharkhand High Court Clarifies
8 months ago
Judicial Service Exams: Question And Answers (MCQs) Based On Latest Judgements- PART-2
1 year, 2 months ago
S.65B Evidence Act Certificate Can Be Produced At Any Stage Of Trial: Supreme Court Allows Prosecution Plea In 2008 Bangalore Blasts Case
1 year, 4 months ago
Court Can Allow Prosecution To Produce Certificate U/S 65-B (4) Evidence Act At A Later Stage During Trial: Allahabad High Court
2 years, 9 months ago
Pride and Prejudice of Certificate Under Section 65B(4), Indian Evidence Act 1872
4 years, 5 months ago
The Law Of Electronic Evidence,The Error Continues
4 years, 6 months ago
Certificate Not Necessary Before Producing Electronic Evidence in Court: SC Clarifies Law
4 years, 7 months ago
[Breaking] Certificate Under Section 65B(4) Evidence Act Is A Condition Precedent To The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: SC [Read Judgment]
4 years, 8 months ago
Is Requirement Of Certificate U/s 65-B(4) Evidence Act Mandatory for Production Of Electronic Evidence? SC Refers To Larger Bench [Read Order]
5 years, 7 months ago
Supreme Court says certificate not mandatory for making electronic evidence judicially admissible
7 years, 1 month ago
SC Clarifies on Electronic Evidence admissibility: No certificate needed in certain cases
7 years, 1 month ago
Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]
7 years, 1 month ago
Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]
7 years, 1 month ago
Electronic Evidence: If Judgment in ‘Anvar Case’ Is Applied Retrospectively, It Would Adversely Affect Administration Of Justice: SC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 8 months ago
Electronic Records Admitted By Trial Court Without Objection Can’t Be Challenged At Appellate Stages If The Objection Relates To Mode Of Proof: SC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 8 months ago
Primary Evidence Of Electronic Record U/S 62 Of Evidence Act Is Admissible Without Compliance With Conditions U/S 65(B): Madras HC [Read Order]
7 years, 9 months ago
Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 3 months ago
CDs are documents, can be considered as evidence under law: SC
9 years, 3 months ago
Some Thoughts on the Admissibility of Electronic Records in the Light of Anvar P.V.vs P.K. Basheer
10 years, 1 month ago
BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to..
13 years, 10 months ago

Discover Related