Haryana judge trying corruption cases booked under anti-graft law
1 year, 8 months ago

Haryana judge trying corruption cases booked under anti-graft law

Hindustan Times  

Under suspension, Haryana judicial officer Sudhir Parmar, who was holding the charge of special CBI judge and special judge under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Panchkula, till April 26 was booked by the Haryana anti-corruption bureau on April 17 under the Prevention of Corruption Act for alleged criminal misconduct and offences relating to a public servant being bribed. Audio recordings, WhatsApp chats formed basis of FIR The ACB registered the FIR against Parmar, his nephew, Ajay Parmar and Bansal, who is the director of real estate company M3M India Pvt Ltd, under Sections 7, 8, 11 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code for offences relating to a public servant being bribed, a public servant taking undue advantage without consideration from the person concerned in proceedings or business transacted by such public servant, criminal misconduct by a public servant and criminal conspiracy. ‘Favouritism, abuse of position, accepting undue advantage’ According to the April 17 FIR accessed by Hindustan Times, “a reliable source information” was received by the ACB against Parmar for allegedly showing favouritism in lieu of undue advantage to Roop Bansal and his brother Basant Bansal of M3M and Lalit Goyal of IREO Group who are accused in CBI and ED cases pending in the special CBI court. The FIR said that according to the facts disclosed in the audio recordings provided by the source, Parmar before being posted as special CBI judge and special judge under PMLA, Panchkula, was posted as additional district and sessions judge, Gurugram, where by abusing his official position of being a judge he got in contact with the owners of M3M and IREO Group and got undue favour by getting his nephew, Ajay Parmar, appointed as legal adviser in M3M at a package of about ₹12 lakh per annum. Audio recordings that did judge in The ACB FIR said that in another audio recording provided by the source, Sudhir Parmar is asking someone for ₹1.5 crore as illegal gratification for meeting the accused.

History of this topic

Follower's Castration Case: Punjab & Haryana HC Directs CBI Court To Decide Afresh Relevance Of Docs Sought By Dera Chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Delhi High Court Orders Day To Day Trial In 2017 Haryana Judicial Paper Leak Case
11 months, 3 weeks ago
Money laundering case: Parmar sent to judicial custody
1 year, 4 months ago
WhatsApp chats fabricated to implicate former CBI judge Sudhir Parmar, says counsel
1 year, 5 months ago
Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Arrest Of Dismissed DSP Who Circulated 'Derogatory' Videos Against HC Judges
1 year, 10 months ago
Illegal phone tapping case: Delhi Police questions Rajasthan CM's aide
3 years, 1 month ago
Calcutta HC Directs CBI to Appear Before WB Speaker for Submitting Chargesheets Against MLAs Without His Permission
3 years, 3 months ago
Plot Allotment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Trial Against Bhupinder Singh Hooda & AJL; Notice Issued To CBI
3 years, 6 months ago
Lawyer Seeks Initiation Of Criminal Contempt Against DIG Of CBI For Alleged Physical Assault On Public Prosecutor
4 years, 2 months ago
Punjab & Haryana HC Frames Charges Against Court Clerk For Maligning Judicial Officers Via YouTube [Read Order]
4 years, 7 months ago
Contempt Of Court : SC Summons Ex- CBI Interim Director Nageswara Rao In Muzaffarpur Case
5 years, 11 months ago
Ayodhya case: Who is Justice UU Lalit, who recused himself from the hearing
6 years ago
Supreme Court likely to pronounce judgment on Alok Verma's plea today; CBI chief challenged govt order sending him on leave
6 years ago
CBI vs CBI LIVE: Govt Intervened in Larger Public Interest So People Don't Lose Faith in CBI: A-G to SC
6 years, 1 month ago

Discover Related