Denying Regularization From Correct Date By Making Distinction Based On Initial Nature Of Work Arbitrary, Violates Art. 14, 16: Rajasthan HC
2 months, 1 week ago

Denying Regularization From Correct Date By Making Distinction Based On Initial Nature Of Work Arbitrary, Violates Art. 14, 16: Rajasthan HC

Live Law  

The Jodhpur bench of Rajasthan High Court quashed the State government's order, which did not regularize a man on the ground that his initial work on daily wages was different from his counterparts, terming the consideration as “irrelevant” and the actions of the State as discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16. Their argument that the petitioner's initial work on daily wages differs is irrelevant once the conditions for regularization were fulfilled. Denying regularization from the correct date infringes on the petitioner's rights to equal pay for equal work and protection under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which ensure equality before the law and prohibit discrimination in employment”. Furthermore, the Court also observed that regularization of the petitioner from the year 1989 had been ordered by the Court by allowing petitioner's earlier writ petition in 2003, and failing to implement the same by the State amounted to undermining administrative propriety.

History of this topic

Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Employee's Demotion From Post Held For 17 Years, Says Decision Rejecting Peer's Plea Seeking Same Relief Not In Rem
2 months, 1 week ago
Employee Entitled To Annual Grade Increments, Arrears Of Last Drawn Salary During Suspension Period: Rajasthan High Court
2 months, 3 weeks ago
Preferential Treatment In Selection Based On Present Place Of Posting Discriminatory, Violates Right To Equality: Rajasthan High Court
4 months, 1 week ago
"Even Equity Has To Be Claimed At Right Juncture": Rajasthan HC Dismisses Employee's Plea Citing 40 Yrs Delay
2 years, 5 months ago
Continued Employment In Public Service Projects For Several Years Creates Rights On Employees: Madras HC Directs State To Frame Regularization Scheme
2 years, 10 months ago
No Parity Can Be Claimed Based On Regularization Of Services Made In Earlier Years : Supreme Court
3 years ago
Negative Discrimination Can't Be Claimed Under Articles 14 & 16 Referring To Persons Erroneously Regularized: Supreme Court
3 years, 3 months ago

Discover Related