
Changes In BNSS To S.156(3) CrPC Power, Cognizance Of Complaints Against Public Servants, Sanction To Prosecute
Live LawA Opportunity of Hearing to Public Servant before taking cognizance on a complaint According to Section 223 of the BNSS, no cognizance can be taken by a magistrate on a complaint against a public servant for any offence alleged to have been committed in the discharge of official duties unless ttwin conditions are fulfilled. The bare text of Section 223 reads as follows: - “A Magistrate shall not take cognizance on a complaint against a public servant for any offence alleged to have been committed in course of the discharge of his official functions or duties unless— such public servant is given an opportunity to make assertions as to the situation that led to the incident so alleged; and a report containing facts and circumstances of the incident from the officer superior to such public servant is received.” Provision of “Deemed Sanction” Added It is worthwhile to mention that the existing procedural law under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. The proviso reads as: - “Provided further that such Government shall take a decision within a period of one hundred and twenty days from the date of the receipt of the request for sanction and in case it fails to do so, the sanction shall be deemed to have been accorded by such Government.” Changes regarding procedure under Section 156 CrPC The existing code under Section 156 empowers the magistrate to order investigation by police officers upon a private complaint received under Section 190 of Cr.P.C. reads as follows: “Any Magistrate empowered under section 210 may, after considering the application supported by an affidavit made under sub-section of section 173, and after making such inquiry as he thinks necessary and submission made in this regard by the police officer, order such an investigation as above-mentioned.” In other words, the new law requires the magistrate to make an inquiry itself after considering the complaint and to also take into consideration of the submission made by the police officer in this regard, before ordering investigation in a private complaint by a police officer. However, the new law BNSS, has made a provision to this effect, where Section 175 reads as: “Any Magistrate empowered under section 210, may, upon receiving a complaint against a public servant arising in course of the discharge of his official duties, order investigation, subject to— receiving a report containing facts and circumstances of the incident from the officer superior to him; and after consideration of the assertions made by the public servant as to the situation that led to the incident so alleged.” Thus, a police investigation on a private complaint against a public servant can be ordered only if the above twin conditions are fulfilled.
History of this topic

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) And Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Monthly Digest – February 2025
Live Law
Sanction For Prosecution Of Public Servants – The Shift In The BNSS
Live Law
S.175(4) BNSS | Magistrate Can Order Probe Against Public Servant Only After Hearing Him & Receiving Report From Superior Officer: Orissa HC
Live Law
Complaint Within Meaning Of CrPC Is One Filed Before Judicial Magistrate & Not Executive Magistrate : Supreme Court
Live Law
S.197 CrPC | When Can Public Servant's Offence Be Linked To Official Duties? Supreme Court Explains Principles
Live Law
Public Servant Exceeding Powers While Performing Official Duties Would Be Protected U/S 197 CrPC: J&K High Court
Live Law
S. 197 CrPC | Once Denied, Sanction to Prosecute Public Servant Cannot Be Granted Again On Same Material : Supreme Court
Live Law
Is Not The Magistrate A Prisoner Of Section 175 (3) Read With Section 173 (4) Of BNSS?
Live Law
S.197 CrPC Applies Only To Acts In Discharge Of Public Servant's Official Duties; Fabrication Of Documents Not Part Of Official Duty: Supreme Court
Live Law
Prior Sanction Required For Referring A Complaint Against Public Servants For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC: Calcutta High Court
Live Law
Sanction U/S 197 CrPC Required To Prosecute Public Servants If Alleged Act Committed Is Directly Concerned With Official Duty: Supreme Court
Live Law![Section 197 CrPC: Employees Of Public Sector Corporations Are Not Entitled To Protection Of Sanction As 'Public Servant': SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Section 197 CrPC: Employees Of Public Sector Corporations Are Not Entitled To Protection Of Sanction As 'Public Servant': SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Breaking: “Is Prior Sanction Mandatory For Referring A Complaint Against Public Servant For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC?” Question Referred To Larger Bench [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking: “Is Prior Sanction Mandatory For Referring A Complaint Against Public Servant For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC?” Question Referred To Larger Bench [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Breaking: “Is Prior Sanction Mandatory For Referring A Complaint Against Public Servant For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC?” Question Referred To Larger Bench [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking: “Is Prior Sanction Mandatory For Referring A Complaint Against Public Servant For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC?” Question Referred To Larger Bench [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Sanction to prosecute govt servants should come quicker, says Bombay High Court
Firstpost![All You Need To Know About Prosecution Sanction [Part-II]](/static/images/error.jpg)
All You Need To Know About Prosecution Sanction [Part-II]
Live Law![Protection of ‘sanction’ to Govt. servants cannot be camouflaged to commit crime; SC summarizes principles governing ‘sanction’ [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Protection of ‘sanction’ to Govt. servants cannot be camouflaged to commit crime; SC summarizes principles governing ‘sanction’ [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Protection of ‘sanction’ to Govt. servants cannot be camouflaged to commit crime; SC summarizes principles governing ‘sanction’ [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Protection of ‘sanction’ to Govt. servants cannot be camouflaged to commit crime; SC summarizes principles governing ‘sanction’ [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Sanction to prosecute Public Servant, not required at pre cognizance stage ; Supreme Court Jt in Anil Kumar v. Aiyappa is per incuriam : Kerala HC
Live Law![No sanction required to prosecute a Retired Public servant under Prevention of Corruption Act, but it is necessary to prosecute him under Penal Code; SC [Read the Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No sanction required to prosecute a Retired Public servant under Prevention of Corruption Act, but it is necessary to prosecute him under Penal Code; SC [Read the Judgment]
Live Law![No sanction required to prosecute a Retired Public servant under Prevention of Corruption Act, but it is necessary to prosecute him under Penal Code; SC [Read the Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No sanction required to prosecute a Retired Public servant under Prevention of Corruption Act, but it is necessary to prosecute him under Penal Code; SC [Read the Judgment]
Live Law
Government sanction is mandatory to investigate a public servant, rules SC
Live LawDiscover Related









































![[Section 223 BNSS] Notice Of Hearing Can Be Issued To Prospective Accused Only After Examining Complainant And Witnesses: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
