
Director Of Prosecution Has To Perform Substantive Functions, 'In-Charge' Arrangement Not Encouraged: Karnataka HC Removes HK Jagadish From Post
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court has removed HK Jagadish as incharge 'Director of Prosecution and Government Litigation', holding his appointment to be illegal and contrary to the statutory provisions of Section 25A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It defended the in-charge arrangement citing lack of eligible Deputy Directors in the department at the relevant time and submitted that now steps are being taken for making regular appointment to the post. However, Court said Section 25A CrPC prescribes concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, as a sine qua non for appointment to the post of Director. Accordingly, Court set aside Jagadish's appointment and directed the State to select and appoint an eligible and qualified candidate to the office in question with the concurrence of Chief Justice, within eight weeks.
History of this topic

Officer Posted 'In-Charge' Of A Post Can Discharge Its Statutory Functions: Karnataka High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Promotion Cannot Be Denied In Cases Where Chargesheet Not Filed In Pending Criminal Case Against Employee: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
TN cannot appoint SPP: Karnataka HC
The Hindu
CBI boss writes to law ministry seeking clarity on role in choosing head of prosecution
India TV NewsDiscover Related





































![[Prevention Of Corruption Act] CBI Can File Final Report Even If No Offence Is Revealed During Probe: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)











