
2018 Amendment To Specific Relief Act Prospective ; Cannot Apply To Transactions Which Took Place Prior To 1.10.2018: Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court held that the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act is prospective and cannot apply to those transactions that took place prior to its coming into force.The bench of CJI NV Ramana, Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli observed thus while allowing an appeal arising out of a specific performance suit. The Supreme Court held that the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act is prospective and cannot apply to those transactions that took place prior to its coming into force. In view of the above discussion, we do not have any hesitation in holding that the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act is prospective and cannot apply to those transactions that took place prior to its coming into force, the court observed. Ltd. | 2022 LiveLaw 712 | CA 5822 -5824 OF 2022 | 25 August 2022 | CJI NV Ramana, Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli Counsel: Sr. Adv Dushyant Dave and Sr. Adv Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv Mukul Rohatgi and Sr. Adv Harish Salve Headnotes Specific Relief Act, 1963; Section 10 - 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act is prospective and cannot apply to those transactions that took place prior to its coming into force.
History of this topic

Supreme Court Annual Digest 2024 | Specific Relief Act, 1963
Live Law
Specific Relief Act: Important Judgments By Supreme Court In 2024
Live Law
S.20 Specific Relief Act | Defendant Can Raise Plea Of Hardship Only If It Was Unforeseeable At Contract Formation: Supreme Court
Live Law
S.20 Specific Relief Act | Defendant Can Raise Plea Of Hardship Only If It Was Unforeseeable At Contract Formation: Supreme Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Recalls Judgment Which Held 2018 Amendment To Specific Relief Act Prospective
Live Law
SRA 2018 Made Specific Performance Of Contract General Rule Rather Than Exception, Legislative Shift Towards Stronger Enforcement Of Contracts: Delhi HC
Live Law
Whether An Amendment Application To Include A Relief Which Is Otherwise Time-Barred Can Be Allowed? SC To Consider
Live Law
2018 Amendment To The Specific Relief Act: Retrospective Or Prospective?
Live Law
'Specific Performance No Longer A Discretionary Relief': Supreme Court Says 2018 Amendment May Not Have Retrospective Application But Can Be A 'Guide'
Live Law![Relief Of Specific Performance Of Contract Is No Longer Discretionary After 2018 Amendment: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Relief Of Specific Performance Of Contract Is No Longer Discretionary After 2018 Amendment: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Timelines For The Making Of An Arbitral Award In View Of The Arbitration And Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2019 – The Continuing Saga Of Retrospective Applicability
Live Law
The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 - Applicability To Pending Suits
Live Law![NI Act: Section 148 Has Retrospective Application, But 143A Is Prospective, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
NI Act: Section 148 Has Retrospective Application, But 143A Is Prospective, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Do The NI Act Amendments Apply Retrospectively?
Live Law![Breaking: Section 148 Of Negotiable Instruments Act Has Retrospective Effect, Holds Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking: Section 148 Of Negotiable Instruments Act Has Retrospective Effect, Holds Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Parliament Passes Specific Relief Amendment Bill Making Specific Performance of Contract Compulsorily Enforceable
Live Law
Specific Performance to Be Mandatory: Key Amendments Proposed in Specific Relief Act 1963
Live Law![‘Specific Performance To Be Compulsorily Ordered By Courts’- Know About Changes Proposed By Specific Relief Amendment Bill [Read The Bill]](/static/images/error.jpg)
‘Specific Performance To Be Compulsorily Ordered By Courts’- Know About Changes Proposed By Specific Relief Amendment Bill [Read The Bill]
Live LawDiscover Related





![Supreme Court Weekly Digest March 2025 [March 10 - 16, 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)




![Supreme Court Weekly Digest With Subject /Statute Wise Index [March 01 to 09]](/static/images/error.jpg)


![[Arbitration Act] Limitation Does Not Stop If Initial Filing Is Non Est, Date Of Filing Must Be Reckoned From Date Of Refiling: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)














![[MSMED Act] Pre-Deposit Of 75% Of Awarded Amount While Challenging Award Cannot Be Scuttled By Petition Under Article 227: J&K High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)


















