Interpretation Of Will: Subsequent Clause Taking Away A Bequest Invalid If There Is Absolute Bequest By Previous Clause: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
7 years ago

Interpretation Of Will: Subsequent Clause Taking Away A Bequest Invalid If There Is Absolute Bequest By Previous Clause: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

A clause in a Will absolutely bequeathed property to a person. The court noted that there was absolute bequest in the first part, and hence subsequent disposition in Ext.A1 Will altering the bequest in favour of the plaintiffs on the first defendant dying issueless is liable to be ignored as having no validity in the eye of law. The contingency of the first defendant dying issueless was not treated by the Court as a ‘defeasance clause’, which can defeat the vesting of title on him. The intention of the testator was obviously to maintain an absolute state in favour of the first defendant with power to encumber or alienate the property and hence not a defeasance clause. But, the last clause in the Will spoke of subsequent divestiture of the property after the bequest in favour of the first defendant and was liable to be ignored.

History of this topic

Probate Not Necessary For Wills Executed By Indian Christians And Muhammadans After State Amendment To Indian Succession Act: Kerala HC
2 months, 2 weeks ago
Muslim Person's Power To Dispose Property By Will Limited For Benefit Of Heirs: Kerala High Court Explains Scope
1 year, 4 months ago
“Law Of Wills”- Questions & Answers By Justice V Ramkumar [Part-XI]
1 year, 8 months ago
Proof Of Will : Onus Is On The Propounder To Remove Suspicious Circumstances : Kerala High Court
3 years ago
Breaking: Priests/Nuns Too Have Rights Of Intestate/ Testamentary Succession Of Property : Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 9 months ago
Subsequent Bequest In Will Void If Absolute Bequest Has Been Made In Same Will: SC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 4 months ago

Discover Related