SC to hear pleas to scrap the sedition law today: Explaining the British-era offence and how it's being 'misused'
FirstpostThe Apex court last year had asked the Centre why it was not repealing the colonial-era law used by the British to silence people like Mahatma Gandhi to suppress the freedom movement, as it expressed concern over the misuse of the provision A Supreme Court bench is scheduled to hear on Wednesday a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the sedition law. The Apex court last year had asked the Centre why it was not repealing the provision used by the British to silence people like Mahatma Gandhi to suppress the freedom movement as it expressed concern over the misuse of the colonial-era penal law. Section 124A IPC states: “Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which a fine may be added; or, with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which a fine may be added; or, with fine.” Introduced by the British in 1870, the sedition law was almost dropped from the Constitution in 1948 after discussions of the Constituent Assembly. In September, 2019, Supreme Court judge Deepak Gupta had observed,“The manner in which the provisions of Section 124A are being misused, begs the question as to whether we should have a re-look at it.” “The law of sedition is more often abused and misused.