'State Should Not Be Impulsive Like An Ordinary Citizen In Defamation Matters And Invoke Sec 199(2) CrPC To Throttle Democracy' :Madras HC Quashes Cases Against N Ram & Ors [Read Judgment]
4 years, 7 months ago

'State Should Not Be Impulsive Like An Ordinary Citizen In Defamation Matters And Invoke Sec 199(2) CrPC To Throttle Democracy' :Madras HC Quashes Cases Against N Ram & Ors [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

In a significant judgment underscoring the importance of press freedom, the Madras High Court on Wednesday quashed the criminal complaints filed against a group of editors and journalists such as N Ram, Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, Siddharth Varadarajan, Nakkeeran Gopal etc.The complaints were lodged in 2012 alleging "criminal defamation against State' over few reports against J Jayalalitha,. Alleging that the reports amounted to defamation of a state functionary, criminal complaints were filed by the Public Prosecutor before the Sessions Court under Section 199 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the State becomes an impulsive prosecutor in criminal defamation matters that too in an era of social media where there are scores of abusive contents made against public figures, the Sessions Court will get clogged with innumerable matters which are sometimes vindictive in nature only to settle scores with opposition political parties" Likening the State to a "parent", the Court observed : "State is like a parent for all citizens in so far as Defamation law is concerned. The materials assessed shall be indicated by the Sessions Court in its order taking cognizance of the complaint filed under section 199 Cr.P.C" Public Prosecutor not to act like a post office The Court said that Public Prosecutor should not act like a "post office" to merely file complaints at the directives of the State, and should independently apply mind on the allegations before filing the complaint. Ingredients of defamation missing The Court noted that in all the cases, the core ingredient required for prosecution through a public prosecutor under section 199 Cr.P.C.

History of this topic

Karnataka High Court Quashes Defamation Case Against Congress Leader Over Remarks On The Word 'Hindu'
3 weeks, 3 days ago
Defamation case: SC relief for AAP leaders
3 months, 1 week ago
SC quashes criminal defamation case against RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav
10 months, 3 weeks ago
Chennai City Public Prosecutor files criminal defamation complaint against Annamalai for allegations against CM
1 year, 7 months ago
Defamation perils: on the Rahul Gandhi case
1 year, 8 months ago
Two takeaways from the Surat court’s order
1 year, 9 months ago
[AAP vs BJP Defamation Case] Not Law, Common Man Wants To Know Truth About Allegations Against Public Servants: Supreme Court
2 years, 3 months ago
Defamation | Magistrate Can't Refer Complaint About Offence U/S 500 IPC To Police For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC: Karnataka High Court
2 years, 7 months ago
No Vicarious Liability For Criminal Offences In Absence Of Statute: Karnataka HC Quashes Defamation Case Against MP Rajeev Chandrashekhar
2 years, 10 months ago
Give Respect To Leaders Of Country/State While Publishing Matters Related To Them: Madras High Court Directs Tamil Newspaper
3 years, 5 months ago
Batting for free speech: On filing of defamation cases against press
4 years, 7 months ago
Judicial Process Should Not Be An Instrument Of Operation Or Needless Harassment: Cautions Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]
5 years ago
Mahua Moitra – Zee News Defamation Cases: What Happens Next?
5 years, 2 months ago

Discover Related