'State Should Not Be Impulsive Like An Ordinary Citizen In Defamation Matters And Invoke Sec 199(2) CrPC To Throttle Democracy' :Madras HC Quashes Cases Against N Ram & Ors [Read Judgment]
Live LawIn a significant judgment underscoring the importance of press freedom, the Madras High Court on Wednesday quashed the criminal complaints filed against a group of editors and journalists such as N Ram, Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, Siddharth Varadarajan, Nakkeeran Gopal etc.The complaints were lodged in 2012 alleging "criminal defamation against State' over few reports against J Jayalalitha,. Alleging that the reports amounted to defamation of a state functionary, criminal complaints were filed by the Public Prosecutor before the Sessions Court under Section 199 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the State becomes an impulsive prosecutor in criminal defamation matters that too in an era of social media where there are scores of abusive contents made against public figures, the Sessions Court will get clogged with innumerable matters which are sometimes vindictive in nature only to settle scores with opposition political parties" Likening the State to a "parent", the Court observed : "State is like a parent for all citizens in so far as Defamation law is concerned. The materials assessed shall be indicated by the Sessions Court in its order taking cognizance of the complaint filed under section 199 Cr.P.C" Public Prosecutor not to act like a post office The Court said that Public Prosecutor should not act like a "post office" to merely file complaints at the directives of the State, and should independently apply mind on the allegations before filing the complaint. Ingredients of defamation missing The Court noted that in all the cases, the core ingredient required for prosecution through a public prosecutor under section 199 Cr.P.C.