Court Trying The Offence Best Suited To Alter Or Modify Charges Already Framed At An Appropriate Stage: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Live LawObserving that the trial court is best placed to alter or modify charges at an appropriate stage, Madhya Pradesh High Court refused to interfere in the trial court’s order that framed charges against an accused under Section 304 of IPC instead of Section 304-A IPC. The single-judge bench of Justice Pranay Verma added that the petitioner/accused would not be put to any prejudice merely because the charge has been initially framed against him under Section 304 Part II of IPC. According to the High Court, even if the trial court decides to alter the charge to Section 304 A IPC later, the petitioner/accused would not be adversely affected. If in the course of the trial, it comes to the conclusion that the evidence produced makes out a lesser offence than the one regards with charges have been framed against the petitioner, it shall always be open for it to convict the petitioner for a lesser offence based on the evidence adduced before it..If the charge under Section 304-A of the IPC had been framed against him, the forum trying the charge might have been different which would however not cause any prejudice to him”, Justice Pranay Verma observed by stating that material produced by way of evidence at the trial stage will play a crucial role in any such scenarios.