
Adnan Syed's case is unique. Withholding of potentially exculpatory evidence is not
NPRAdnan Syed's case is unique. Withholding of potentially exculpatory evidence is not Enlarge this image toggle caption Brian Witte/AP Brian Witte/AP The case of Adnan Syed, who served more than 20 years in prison on murder charges before his conviction was vacated on Monday, is unique because of the enormous publicity it garnered through the hit true-crime podcast Serial. Syed's case highlights how the withholding of potentially exculpatory evidence by police and prosecutors can often lead to wrongful convictions. Withholding potentially exculpatory evidence violates a key legal principle Such conduct is a violation of what is known as the Brady rule, which requires prosecutors to turn over any evidence that could help exonerate a criminal defendant. Enlarge this image toggle caption Brian Witte/AP Brian Witte/AP Cases in which prosecutors don't follow the rule are "shockingly common," says Vanessa Potkin, director of special litigation at the Innocence Project.
History of this topic

Adnan Syed to stay free after judge decides on time served for his murder sentence in ‘Serial’ case
Associated Press
Adnan Syed’s murder conviction still stands as he seeks sentence reduction in ‘Serial’ case
Associated Press
Adnan Syed, subject of ‘Serial’ podcast, is freed after conviction overturned
LA TimesDiscover Related










































