
‘Statutory Provisions Are For Some Purpose, Not For Fun’: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Phone Tapping Orders
Live LawThe Rajasthan High Court has quashed the three interception orders for phone tapping of a private individual, issued by authorities in the state in 2020-2021 on the ground of “public safety” in exercise of power under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885. In other words, required mandates could not have been ignored or superceded by the State or its machinery leading to offend the right under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.” It added: "If the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in PUCL’ case which has been reinforced and approved by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Puttaswamy’s case as well as mandates of Acts and Rules are allowed to be flouted to affect illegal interception of messages it would lead to breeding contempt and arbitrariness." Puttaswamy Vs. Union of India, to state that, “the proposition that illegal tapping of phone conversation violates right to privacy is already accepted by a 9 Judges Constitution Bench decision in the case.” Considering the argument of the petitioner, the court said, “I find force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that impugned orders were never sent to the Review Committee which ought to have been sent within statutory period and the Review Committee was also expected to take decision on the validity of the impugned orders within a specified period.” “The statutory provisions are for some purpose and not for fun. Referring to Sub-rule of Rule 419A of Telegraph Amendment Rules, 2007 which requires that the authority passing any order under Section 5 of the Telegraph Act shall consider possibility of acquiring the information by other means and the direction under sub-rule shall be issued only when it is not possible to acquire the information by any other reasonable means, the court said, “In the case on hand, merely a bald statement has been recorded that acquisition of information is not possible by any other means.” Case Title: Shashikant Joshi v. State Of Rajasthan & Ors
History of this topic

No Hearing Given: Rajasthan HC Quashes Trial Court Order Making Adverse Remarks Against Circle Officer For Alleged Negligence In Probe
Live Law
Customs Officers Who Assaulted Complainant To 'Extract Truth' Cannot Be Said To Have Acted Outside Official Duties: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Rajasthan Civil Services Rules | Apprehension Of Inquiry Taking Long Time Not Ground To Ward Off Disciplinary Inquiry U/S 19: High Court
Live Law
Rajasthan Electricity (Duty) Act | Appellate Authority Can Pass Orders Incidental To Matter Before It Including Interim Orders Unless Prohibited: High Court
Live Law
Quasi-Judicial Authority Can’t Pass Non-Speaking Orders: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Punishment Imposed On Constable Allegedly Found Intoxicated On Duty
Live Law
Rajasthan High Court Orders Reinstatement Of BSF Constable Terminated In 2004 For Overstay Of Casual Leave
Live Law![[Denial Of Info. Under RTI] 'Take Action Against Officer Under RTI Act Who Acted In A Callous Manner ', Gujarat HC Directs SIC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Denial Of Info. Under RTI] 'Take Action Against Officer Under RTI Act Who Acted In A Callous Manner ', Gujarat HC Directs SIC [Read Order]
Live Law
Rajasthan political crisis | BJP demands CBI probe into alleged phone tapping
The Hindu
'Disproportionate Restriction On Innocent Civilians':Plea In Gujarat HC Against Perpetual Imposition of S. 144 CrPC In Ahmedabad
Live Law
The Significance Of Bombay HC Ruling On Phone Tapping
Live Law![Phone Tapping Permitted Only In Case Of Public Emergency Or In Interest Of Public Safety:Bombay HC[Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Phone Tapping Permitted Only In Case Of Public Emergency Or In Interest Of Public Safety:Bombay HC[Read Judgment]
Live Law
Phone Tapping In India: A Need To Revisit Law?
Live Law
Phone Tapping In India: A Need To Revisit Law?
Live Law![Not Mandatory To Call Two ‘Respectable’ Persons For A Raid Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Not Mandatory To Call Two ‘Respectable’ Persons For A Raid Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
Live Law![Not Mandatory To Call Two ‘Respectable’ Persons For A Raid Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Not Mandatory To Call Two ‘Respectable’ Persons For A Raid Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
Live Law![Petition Filed Before Rajasthan HC Challenging Ordinance Shielding Public Servants From Probe [Read Petition]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Petition Filed Before Rajasthan HC Challenging Ordinance Shielding Public Servants From Probe [Read Petition]
Live Law
HC orders sealing of Rajasthan Cricket Association office | IndiaTV News
India TV NewsDiscover Related
































![[Prevention Of Corruption Act] Preliminary Inquiry Before Obtaining Approval From Competent Authority Violates Section 17A: Karnataka HC](/static/images/error.jpg)














