Centre wanted vetting process in picking judges
The HinduThe government, just a little over a month before the Supreme Court Collegium recommended advocate Victoria Gowri for Madras High Court judgeship on January 17, 2023, had in the apex court flagged the “compelling need” for a debate to include an “appropriate mechanism” in the Memorandum of Procedure for “assessment of the personality” of candidates under consideration for judicial appointments to constitutional courts. The government’s letter, which was sent only days after the Karnan judgment, told the Supreme Court that a “new opportunity” had been created, and there was a “compelling need to make improvements” in the selection process under the Collegium system. The Centre said this was one of the reasons why the finalisation of the Memorandum of Procedure for judicial appointments was still pending despite the court’s October 2015 direction to the government in the NJAC verdict to “supplement” the MoP in consultation with the Supreme Court to make the selection process “transparent and accountable”. However, the Bench said the “final view of the Supreme Court Collegium” was expressed in the version of the MoP it had sent to the government on March 13, 2017, almost four months before the Karnan case verdict.