Recovery Of Tax Dues Of A Company From Its Directors Under Section 179 Of Income Tax Act, Cannot Be Invoked Casually: Bombay High Court
Live LawThe Bombay High Court has ruled that exercise of jurisdiction under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the director of a public company, to recover the tax dues of the said company, is violative of the principles of natural justice, where the Income Tax Authority has failed to give any opportunity of hearing to the director before applying the principle of 'lifting the corporate veil'. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax passed an order under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 holding that the petitioner Rajendra R. Singh, the director of the assessee company- M/s. The Court also observed that the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kishan Lal versus Union of India had quashed the order passed by the revenue authorities against the director of a public company by exercising jurisdiction under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act. Noting that the ACIT, in the notice issued under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, did not inform the petitioner of its intention to treat the assessee company as a private company by invoking the principle of 'lifting the corporate veil', the Court held that the said notice did not refer to any material or conclusion based upon which the revenue department could assume jurisdiction against the directors of the assessee company under Section 179.