Hindurashtra Comments In Judgment: SC Declines To Withdraw Judicial Works From Meghalaya HC Judge
The Supreme Court Friday refused to withdraw judicial work from Meghalaya High Court judge Justice Sudip Ranjan Sen who had created controversy by his remarks that India should have been declared a Hindu country at the time of partition in 1947. A bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjiv Khanna asked the petitioner, who has sought withdrawal of judicial work. A bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjiv Khanna asked the petitioner, who has sought withdrawal of judicial work from Justice Sen, to amend the prayer and seek expunction of the controversial remarks in the judgment. "Even today, in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan, the Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Christians, Parsis, Khasis, Jaintias and Garos are tortured and they have no place to go and those Hindus who entered India during partition are still considered as foreigners, which in my understanding is highly illogical, illegal and against the principle of natural justice," Justice Sen had said.
Discover Related

Not for us at all: Top court rejects plea for protection of Hindus in Bangladesh

Nothing against secularism: Meghalaya HC judge Sudip Ranjan Sen

Exclusive: Indian judiciary's freedom already compromised, says Arun Shourie

Supreme Court Set To Revisit 'Hindutva' Judgment After 20 Years

Petition filed in Delhi HC against Supreme Court Collegium and its Recommendations

Petition filed in Delhi HC against Supreme Court Collegium and its Recommendations
