Confessional Statement Of Co-Accused; Delhi High Court Quashes Charges Against Chartered Account For Being Speculative
Live LawThe Delhi High Court has quashed the charges framed against a Chartered Account for aiding his client in money laundering purely on the basis of confessional statements made by a co-accused under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner Vinod Kumar Kila filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court against the charges framed by the Special Judge, CBI under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 13 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988. The petitioner submitted before the High Court that an FIR was registered by the CBI against Arvind Kumar, the Chief Engineer of Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation, under Section 13 read with Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, read with Section 109 of IPC, on the ground that he, being a public servant, was in possession of assets beyond his disclosed source of income. The Bench added that retracted statements made by a co-accused is utterly inadequate to establish, prima-facie, the participation of the petitioner in a conspiracy with the co-accused to facilitate the commission of the offences under Section 109 IPC read with Sections 13 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.