In Case Of Amendment To A Patent Specification, The Invention Before & After Amendment Need Not Be Identical: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that amendments to a patent specification or claims prior to grant ought to be construed more liberally than narrowly. The court opined that the language used in the objections shows that the claims as originally filed were sought for "product or process". The court also stated that– "It is common understanding in the field of patents that product claims are much broader claims than process claims. As per the court, the purport and intention of this Report was to give broader and wider permissibility for amendment of claims and specification prior to the grant and restrict the same post the grant and "When this standard, as contemplated by the Ayyangar Committee Report, is applied to Section 59 of the Act as it stands today, it becomes clear that amendments to a patent specification or claims prior to grant ought to be construed more liberally rather than narrowly.
Discover Related

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 24 To March 30, 2025

Application U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act Not Maintainable If Not Filed With Copy Of Arbitral Award: Delhi High Court

Delhi HC directs NLU to respond to CLAT 2025 result challenges within two weeks

Tax Weekly Round-Up: February 23 - March 02, 2025

Supreme Court Annual Digest 2024 | Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Supreme Court rules against directing legislature on law enactment

Courts can't direct legislature to enact law a particular way: Supreme Court

Madras High Court Upholds Rejection Of AI-Human Integration Patent Claim
