Vaccines Not Effective, Mandatory Vaccination Unconstitutional, Against Individual's Rights And Self Determination: Petitioner Files Additional Affidavit Before Supreme Court

While challenging the validity of mandates imposed on vaccination in India, an affidavit has been filed before the Supreme Court arguing that administering vaccines through coercion cannot be a matter of public health since the vaccines are not an effective guarantee against infection and transmission.The petitioner has argued that as vaccination does not prevent transmission of the. The submissions have been made through an additional affidavit filed by Dr Jacob Puliyel, a former member of the National Technical Advisory Group of Immunisation, in his petition filed seeking directions for public disclosure of clinical trial data of COVID vaccines, and to stop the coercive mandate issued by various governments for vaccination. Through the additional affidavit the petitioner has sought to bring on record the following aspects for the Court's consideration: Scientific evidence that natural immunity being long-lasting and robust as compared to vaccine immunity Vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission for Covid-19 and are not effective in preventing against infection from the new variants, Clinical trials in relation to the vaccines have not been completed and vaccines are only authorised for emergency use Serious adverse events are being reported in India and globally from the Covid 19 vaccinations. right to life, personal liberty and livelihood, especially when there exists no reasonable nexus between vaccination and prohibition of the continuance of occupation and/or profession The petitioner has also cited the following articles to support his stand: Article in the National Geographic Science : According to the petitioner, the article states that a study has shown that in the case of a breakthrough infection, the Delta variant is able to grow in the noses of vaccinated people to the same degree as if they were not vaccinated at all.