
Partnership Act | Outgoing Partner Entitled To Share In Profits Derived From His Share In Assets Of Firm: Supreme Court
Live LawIn a recent ruling, the Supreme Court held that if a partner is carrying on business with the assets of the firm, till a final settlement is made, the outgoing partner, would have the right to seek accounts and a share in the profits which might be derived from his share in the assets of the firm. The bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra observed that when an entity takes over the assets of a partnership without an outgoing partner's consent, the profits earned by the entity using the partnership firm's assets would be proportionally distributed to the outgoing partner. The main issue at hand concerns the division of assets and profits following dissolution and the responsibilities of partners regarding firm assets. Therefore, in light of the provisions of Section 37 of the 1932 Act, if the fourth defendant is carrying on business with the assets of the firm, till a final settlement is made, the plaintiff, who would fall in the category of an outgoing partner, would have the right to seek for accounts and a share in the profits which might be derived from his share in the assets of the firm.” “As to what extent the business of the appellant company is derived from the assets of the firm is a matter of evidence which parties may have to adduce in the course of the proceedings relating to the preparation of the final decree pursuant to the order of remand.”, the court added.
History of this topic

Partnership Act | Outgoing Partner Entitled To Share In Profits Derived From His Share In Assets Of Firm: Supreme Court
Live Law![Retirement Of One Partner Amounts To Dissolution Of Partnership Firm Consisting Of Only Two Partners: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Retirement Of One Partner Amounts To Dissolution Of Partnership Firm Consisting Of Only Two Partners: SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related













![[S.29 Karnataka Excise Act] Partnership Firm's Bar License Can Be Cancelled Over Unpaid Fees Following Change In Partners: High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)




![[AGR Case] 'Can Spectrum Be Sold In Insolvency Proceedings?' SC Examines Bona Fides Of Telecos' Bankruptcy Claims](/static/images/error.jpg)
![Section 141 NI Act: Company Includes Partnership Firm Or Other Association Of Individuals [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
![Dissolution Deed Of Partnership Firm Which Merely Allocates Properties To Partners Does Not Confer Title In Immovable Property : Kerala HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)


![Sec 319 CrPC cannot be invoked to add Partnership firm as accused in a Trial under Sec 138 NI Act; Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
![Sec 319 CrPC cannot be invoked to add Partnership firm as accused in a Trial under Sec 138 NI Act; Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)

