Delhi State Commission Holds FIITJEE Liable For Deficiency In Service
2 weeks, 2 days ago

Delhi State Commission Holds FIITJEE Liable For Deficiency In Service

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, Ms. Pinki held FIITJEE liable for deficiency in service for collecting the full two-year fee from the complainant without making the required deposit or returning the interest. Dissatisfied with the District Commission's order, FIITJEE filed an appeal before the State Commission of Delhi. In light of these arguments, FIITJEE urged the State Commission to overturn the District Commission's order. Observations by the State Commission The State Commission observed that FIITJEE failed to provide evidence that no student was admitted to replace the complainant's daughter after her withdrawal from the coaching program.

Delhi State Commission Complainant Fee District Fiitjee  fiitjee  twoyear  liable  required  service  fee  holds  commission  deficiency  complainant  delhi  refund  district  daughter  state

History of this topic

Kerela State Commission Holds FIITJEE Liable For Deficiency In Services And Unfair Trade Practices
2 weeks, 4 days ago

Kerela State Commission Holds FIITJEE Liable For Deficiency In Services And Unfair Trade Practices

Live Law  

The Kerela State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench of Mr. Justice Sri. K. R held FIITJEE Ltd. liable for deficiency in services and unfair trade practices as it failed to fulfil its promise. Being aggrieved, the Complainant filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam for refund of Rs. Dissatisfied by the order, FIITJEE Ltd. filed an …

Failing To Refund Advances As Per Agreed Terms: Delhi State Commission Holds TDI Infracorp Liable For Deficiency In Service
2 weeks, 4 days ago

Failing To Refund Advances As Per Agreed Terms: Delhi State Commission Holds TDI Infracorp Liable For Deficiency In Service

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, Ms. Pinki held that failing to refund advances as per the terms of the agreement amounts to deficiency in service. Contentions of the Builder The builder argued that the complaint is not maintainable as the complainant is merely a speculative investor and not a “Consumer” as per the Consumer Protection …

Consumer Fora Possesses Discretionary Powers To Award Compensation: Delhi State Commission
5 months, 3 weeks ago

Consumer Fora Possesses Discretionary Powers To Award Compensation: Delhi State Commission

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki, held that the consumer fora have the discretion to decide on compensation to ensure fairness and encourage better service practices. Aggrieved by the District Forum's order, the complainant appealed before the State Commission to enhance compensation. Contentions of the Opposite Party The doctor filed a cross-appeal denying …

Deficiency In Service: NCDRC Dismisses Indian Railways' Revision Petition, Directs To Compensate Rs. 4.6 Lakhs
1 year, 4 months ago

Deficiency In Service: NCDRC Dismisses Indian Railways' Revision Petition, Directs To Compensate Rs. 4.6 Lakhs

Live Law  

The NCDRC under the Presiding Member Dr. Inder Jit Singh dismissed the Revision Petition filed by the Indian Railways holding it liable for deficiency in service. Observations of the Commission: The NCDRC dismissing the Revision Petition observed that there is no merit in the Railways' argument that the incident falls outside the jurisdiction of the Consumer Protection Act and should …

Discover Related