
UAPA | Individuals Not Members Of Any Terrorist Organization Can Also Be Prosecuted For 'Terrorist Act': Karnataka High Court
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court has said that it is not necessary that a person being prosecuted for "terrorist act" defined under Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities Act, 1967, should be a member of a terrorist organization. It was also contended that under Sections 16, 18 and 20 of the UAP Act any individual who commits terrorist act can be prosecuted for the said offence and it is not necessary that he should be a member of any banned organization which is mentioned in first schedule of UAP Act as terrorist organization. the Court has to consider the material on record and ascertain whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against the accused persons is prima facie true and if it is not, then the Court can exercise its discretion and also there is a rider that the burden is high on the accused in terms of the proviso contained in Section 43-D of the UAP Act to demonstrate that the prosecution has not been able to show that there exists reasonable grounds to show that the accusations against them is prima facie true. Therefore, as per the provisions contained under Section 43 of the UAP Act the accused persons facing charge under the provisions of the said Act are not entitled for bail unless the Court comes to the conclusion that there is no prima facie case against them."
History of this topic

'Can't ignore speeches for brainwashing': Appeal in anti-terror law case rejected
India Today![[UAPA] Contemplation Of Terrorist Act For Years Without Giving Effect To It Constitutes A Terrorist Act: Delhi High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
[UAPA] Contemplation Of Terrorist Act For Years Without Giving Effect To It Constitutes A Terrorist Act: Delhi High Court
Live Law
New Penal Code Bill Widens Scope Of "Terrorist Act", Includes Acts Threatening Economic Security Of India
Live Law
Supreme Court Issues Notice On NIA's Plea Challenging HC Order Which Held Mere Attendance Of 'Jihadi' Meetings Won't Be "Terrorist Act" Under UAPA
Live Law
10 individuals, including Hizbul commanders, declared 'terrorists' under UAPA
India TV News
Explained: How an organisation is banned under stringent UAPA law
India Today
Merely Attending 'Jihadi' Meetings Of An Organization Which Is Not Banned By Govt Prima Facie Not 'Terrorist Act' Under UAPA: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
LeT chief Hafeez Saeed’s son designated as a terrorist under UAPA
The Hindu
Mere association or support for a terror outfit does not attract UAPA: Supreme Court
The Hindu
Mere Support To Terrorist Organization Without Intention To Further Its Activities Does Not Attract Section 38/39 UAPA : Supreme Court
Live Law
"Young Children Are Idealists, Inspired By Certain Ideology. But There is No Allegation That They Have Intention To Further The Activities": Sr.Ad. Basant Argues In Allan Thwaha UAPA Case
Live Law
‘Misused, abused’: India’s harsh terror law under rare scrutiny
Al Jazeera
'Terrorist Acts' Under UAPA Only Deal With Matters Impacting 'Defence Of India' And Not Ordinary Law & Order Problems : Delhi High Court
Live Law
All terrorists are criminals but not all criminals are terrorists: Delhi HC
The Hindu
42 Outfits Banned in India for Involvement in Terror Activities: Govt
News 18![Centre Designates Chhota Shakeel, Tiger Memon, Bhatkal Brothers & 14 Others As 'Terrorists' [Read Notification]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Centre Designates Chhota Shakeel, Tiger Memon, Bhatkal Brothers & 14 Others As 'Terrorists' [Read Notification]
Live Law
Hizbul chief Syed Salahuddin, IM's Bhatkal brothers among 18 designated as terrorists under UAPA
Firstpost
Hizb Chief, Bhatkal Brothers, IC814 Hijackers Among 18 More Designated 'Terrorists' Under UAPA
News 18
Hizbul Mujahideen Chief Sallahuddin, IM's Bhatkal Brothers Designated 'Terrorists' Under UAPA
News 18
India designates nine individuals linked to Khalistani groups as terrorists
The Hindu![Plea In SC Challenges The Unfettered Power Of Government To Designate An Individual As A Terrorist[Read Petition]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Plea In SC Challenges The Unfettered Power Of Government To Designate An Individual As A Terrorist[Read Petition]
Live Law
New Act UAPA: Absolute power to state
The Hindu
SC seeks Centre's response on pleas challenging constitutional validity of Section 35, 36 of UAPA Act
Firstpost
Individuals can now be declared as terrorists: President Kovind gives assent to UAPA amendments
India Today
Individuals from Telangana, AP under UAPA terror lens
Deccan Chronicle
Opinion | Aaj Ki Baat July 24 episode: Only Congress can tell why it is opposing amendments to UAPA
India TV News
Essential to keep law enforcement agencies one step ahead of terrorists: Amit Shah on UAPA Amendment Bill
India TV News!['Mere Membership Of Banned Organization Will Not Lead To Inference Of Committing Terrorist Act'; SC Upholds Bail To Alleged Maoist Sympathiser [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
'Mere Membership Of Banned Organization Will Not Lead To Inference Of Committing Terrorist Act'; SC Upholds Bail To Alleged Maoist Sympathiser [Read Order]
Live Law
Vague definition of a terrorist, several ad hoc amendments make Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act a draconian law
Firstpost
Unlawful Activities Act: India's anti-terrorism law's ambiguous nature gives unreasonable power to authorities
Firstpost
Govt may term Sanatan Sanstha terror entity, but gaping holes in law hamper police action on fringe elements
Firstpost
Offences threatening economic security now under UAPA
The Hindu
Rethink the new UAPA
The HinduDiscover Related






























Centre recommends legal action against 'individual' with ‘criminal links and antecedents’ based on US allegations
New Indian Express











