Non-Deduction of TDS At The Year End As The Amount Payable Was Not Identifiable: Penalty not justifiable- ITAT
Live LawThe Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, consisting of Kul Bharat and R.K. Panda, upheld the CIT order, holding that the mere fact that taxes were not deducted on the year end provision but were deducted and deposited upon crystallisation of liability to pay the expenses does not automatically justify the imposition of a penalty under section 271C of the Income Tax Act. The JCIT issued a show cause notice asking the assessee as to why the penalty under section 271C read with section 274 of the Income Tax Act should not be imposed. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT, the appellant/department appealed against the order before the ITAT and contended that CIT was not right in holding that a penalty was not leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act without appreciating the fact that the deductor assessee has failed to comply with the statutory provisions under sections 194C and 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by not deducting TDS on credit/payment of expenses. In the lack of invoices and resultant duty to make the payment, the ITAT upheld the order of the CIT cancelling the penalty on the basis that the assessee did not withhold taxes on the year-end provision for expenses under section 40/40 of the Income Tax Act.