
High Courts Guardians Of Fundamental Rights & Constitution, Must Not Mechanically Dismiss Writ Petitions Over Delays And Laches : Supreme Court
Live LawIn the case where Rs.5 lakhs honorarium was awarded to an 83-yr old ex-constable who saved lives by killing a dacoit in 1986, the Supreme Court recently held that High Courts in the country should not mechanically dismiss writ petitions seeking enforcement of fundamental rights on the ground of 'delay and laches', without considering all relevant factors.For context, the petitioner in this. In the case where Rs.5 lakhs honorarium was awarded to an 83-yr old ex-constable who saved lives by killing a dacoit in 1986, the Supreme Court recently held that High Courts in the country should not mechanically dismiss writ petitions seeking enforcement of fundamental rights on the ground of 'delay and laches', without considering all relevant factors. It is with a deep sense of regret that we end the discussion here expressing hope that as the sentinel on the qui vive, the high courts in the country would do well not to mechanically dismiss writ petitions on the ground of delay and laches without considering all the relevant factors", said a bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and Ujjal Bhuyan. Distinguishing a case alleging breach of fundamental rights from a case alleging breach of a statutory right, the Court added: "When a litigant approaches a high court invoking its high prerogative writ jurisdiction with a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution alleging that the impugned State action is in breach of his Fundamental Right and claims that the breach be bridged by issuing appropriate writ/order/direction as distinguished from a claim for enforcement of a statutory right, it partakes the character of a duty on the part of such high court to enforce the right breached as the guardian of the Constitution."
History of this topic

Article 226 | Writ Court Can Refuse Action Against Illegality To Do Substantial Justice : Supreme Court
Live Law
High Courts should not sit on bail pleas: Supreme Court
The Hindu
Compliance Of An Order Under Threat Of Contempt Cannot Take Away Party's Right To Challenge That Order: Supreme Court
Live Law
When Can High Courts Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 Despite Existence Of Statutory Remedies? Supreme Court Explains
Live Law
Supreme Court Shocked At Advocate Telling High Court That He Won't Argue Before Particular Bench, Issues Contempt Notice
Live Law
Article 226 | High Court Ought To Relegate Parties To Alternate Remedies When There Are Serious Factual Disputes: Supreme Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Dismisses Cardinal George Alencherry's Plea To Quash Criminal Case Over Land Scam
Live Law
Writ Petitions On The Ground Of 'Exceptional Circumstances' Against Order Passed By The Arbitral Tribunal Not Maintainable: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Directions To Expedite Trial In A Particular Case Must Be Passed Only For Extremely Compelling Reasons : Supreme Court
Live Law
Writ Petition Can Be Entertained Only In Exceptional Circumstances When Alternate Remedy Is Available: Supreme Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Expresses Concerns Of Judicial Propriety, Discipline Over P&H High Court Entertaining Fresh Plea When Proceedings Before It Pending
Live Law![No Bar In Dismissing 'Admitted' Writ Petition On Ground Of Alternative Remedy, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No Bar In Dismissing 'Admitted' Writ Petition On Ground Of Alternative Remedy, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related






![Supreme Court Weekly Digest With Subject /Statute Wise Index [March 01 to 09]](/static/images/error.jpg)







































