Judge won’t stop oil from flowing through disputed pipeline
BISMARCK, N.D. — A judge refused to head off the imminent flow of oil in the disputed Dakota Access pipeline, likely clearing the way for operations to begin next week. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., denied a request by the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Sioux tribes to stop oil from flowing while the tribes appeal his decision last week allowing pipeline construction to finish. Texas-based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners is finishing up pipeline work beneath Lake Oahe, a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota and the last piece of construction on the 1,200-mile, $3.8 billion pipeline to move North Dakota oil to a distribution point in Illinois. Both ETP and the Army Corps of Engineers had objected to the tribes’ latest attempt to halt the project, with Corps attorneys saying in court documents that President Donald Trump “has expressly determined that the pipeline is ‘in the national interest.’” The Corps last month granted ETP permission to lay pipe under the reservoir that it manages for the federal government, after Trump in January urged the project’s completion after months of legal delays. The Corps on Tuesday filed its opposition to those requests, saying the agency’s permission for the Lake Oahe work “represents the culmination of over two years of detailed environmental analysis and extensive consultation with.” The pipeline saga also has endured for months outside of the courtroom, with about 750 arrests of protesters in southern North Dakota from August through February.







































Discover Related

A court ordered Greenpeace to pay a pipeline company $660M. What happens next?

'Travesty of justice': Greenpeace slapped with huge penalty in Dakota Access pipeline case

Court slaps Greenpeace with $660m in damages for Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Court slaps Greenpeace with $660m in damages for Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Oil Pipeline Suit

Greenpeace must pay $660m to oil company over pipeline protests, jury says

Pipeline company’s lawsuit against Greenpeace goes to a North Dakota jury

A $300 Million Lawsuit Is Threatening a Storied Activist Group. You Should Be Worried.

Greenpeace trial begins in North Dakota in key free speech case

Greenpeace says a pipeline company’s lawsuit threatens the organization’s future

Greenpeace sounds alarm over pipeline firm's legal attack

Michigan appeals court upholds permits for Great Lakes pipeline tunnel project

Could Canada really stop oil flow to the US in response to Trump tariffs?

Alaska governor asks Trump to roll back restrictions on oil and gas drilling

Inglewood Oil Field owner sues California for ‘illegal’ terminating of operations

Developers stop oil drilling in Surrey amid legal row after Supreme Court ruling

Decision to reduce water flows in California’s delta sparks debate over imperiled fish

A judge sides with states over Biden and allows gas export projects to move forward
