Rajasthan High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointments Of AAGs, Law Officers; Says Executive's Domain To Decided Their Suitability
Live LawThe Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a PIL filed by the national President of “Lashkar-E-Hind”, challenging the appointment of Additional Advocate Generals and Law Officers by the State Government, for lacking any merits and being filed solely on the basis of vague allegations. “The suitability of a lawyer who is engaged by the Government is a matter exclusively within the domain of the executive decision and such a decision cannot be challenged on the ground that other suitable and more competent lawyers have been left out and by doing so the larger public interest has been overlooked.” The division bench of Justice Rekha Borana and Justice Shree Chandrashekhar was hearing a petition that challenged the Appointments made in February 2024 on the grounds that the same were illegal and arbitrary for not following the mandate and procedure laid down in the Rajasthan Law and Legal Affairs Department Manual, 1999 and the Rajasthan State Litigation Policy, 2018. After going through all the grounds challenging the maintainability of the PIL like the locus standi of the petitioner, his reckless and sweeping statements in intemperate language made without any substance as well as him not challenging the previous Appointments made using the same procedure, the Court opined that, “In our considered opinion, the present writ petition does not carry any element of public interest and the State-respondents have rightly challenged the maintainability of the writ petition. “This cannot be a legal ground to entertain a writ petition labeled as a Public Interest Litigation that claim of every eligible person was not considered in the matter of appointment of Additional Advocate General and other Law Officers.” It was held that judicial review in contractual matters could be made where violation of Art.