'Based On Speculation, Tarnishes Reputation': AP High Court Junks Lawyer's Plea Accusing AG Of Corrupt Practice In Appointment Of Standing Counsel
Live LawAndhra Pradesh High Court has expressed strong displeasure over an Advocate's PIL seeking removal of a Standing Counsel and a consequential CBI inquiry into the appointments made on the recommendation of the Advocate General alleging 'corrupt practices for personal gains'. The Division Bench of Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice R. Raghunandan Rao said the allegations are merely speculative and have the effect of tarnishing the image and reputation of the Advocate General and the Standing Counsel in question. The petitioner, who appeared as a party in person, is an advocate by profession and challenged the extension of Standing Counsel of Municipalities on the ground that it was against the Andhra Pradesh Law Officers Appointment and Conditions of Service Instructions, 2000 and guidelines of the Apex Court in State of Punjab vs. Beijeshwar Singh Chahal. The petitioner alleged a quid pro quo situation between the Advocate General and the petitioner/advocate in the 2019 writ stating that the Advocate General had a personal interest in forwarding the name of the standing counsel in question.