Defendants Cannot Introduce Death Certificate As Additional Evidence Without Relevant Pleadings: Jharkhand HC Rules In Property Dispute
Live LawSetting aside an order of a district court allowing introduction of a death certificate as evidence in a property dispute, the Jharkhand High Court said that a death certificate issued years after the death, based solely on an affidavit, cannot be admitted as additional evidence if it lacks evidentiary basis and is inconsistent with the pleadings. Presiding over the case Justice Subhash Chand held that, “Even if this document, which is public document issued on the individual information of the applicant/ defendant after the judgment and decree passed in the original suit, this public document itself cannot be taken on record because there is no pleading to that effect on record on behalf of the defendants in regard to the date of death of their mother Ramwati Devi and there is no plea that Ramwati Devi had not executed sale deed in favour of plaintiff prior to her death.” The Court made this observation while setting aside the order of the District Judge-III, Lohardaga, which had allowed the appellants to introduce a death certificate as additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court noted that the death certificate, which claimed Ramwati Devi died in 1970, was issued in 2018 based solely on an affidavit submitted by one of the defendants. reported in 2003 AIR SCW 1383 and Satish Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Haryana reported in 4 SCC 760, reiterated, “no party can be permitted to adduce evidence beyond pleadings.” Consequently, the Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed by the plaintiffs, setting aside the order of the District Judge, to the extent it permitted the introduction of the death certificate.