
Bombay HC reserves order on petition of MHADA workers urging pension
India TV NewsMumbai: The Bombay High Court yesterday reserved order on a petition filed by employees of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority seeking pension on superannuation but the state said it will not sanction such a benefit. The order was reserved by a bench headed by Justice V M Kanade which indicated that it might give a judgement tomorrow.The employees pleaded that MHADA had already passed a resolution deciding to grant pensionary benefits to the workers who had joined after November 1, 2005.However, the state had not granted approval to this proposal of MHADA. The employees also demanded pension on the ground that the state had adopted Civil Service Rules which provides for payment of montly pension on superannuation.Advocate General Darius Khambata today argued it is not a legal right of the employees to get pension. Whether to give pension or not is a matter of policy decision for the state.
History of this topic

'Pension Scheme Must Be Interpreted Widely' : Supreme Court Allows Central Govt Service To Be Included For Pension Of Gujarat Govt Employee
Live Law
Illegal To Withhold Employee's Pension, Gratuity Particularly When Already Enrolled In An Old Pension Scheme: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Interview with Labour Minister | SC order on higher pension contribution has many implications, says Bhupender Yadav
The Hindu
Calcutta HC Issues Contempt Notice To State Chief Secretary & Other Authorities For Non-Compliance With Order On Pension Scheme Implementation
Live Law![Plea Of Lack Of Funds Not Legally Tenable In Matters Of Payment Of Pension & Other Post Retirement Benefits: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Plea Of Lack Of Funds Not Legally Tenable In Matters Of Payment Of Pension & Other Post Retirement Benefits: Gauhati HC [Read Order]
Live Law![New Pension Scheme For Judicial Officers Appointed Post April 1, 2006 Is Optional: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
New Pension Scheme For Judicial Officers Appointed Post April 1, 2006 Is Optional: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
Live Law![Financial Difficulty Not A Ground To Restrain The Pension Benefits Of Retired Employee: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Financial Difficulty Not A Ground To Restrain The Pension Benefits Of Retired Employee: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![M’rashtra’s New Pension Scheme Not Applicable To Judicial Officers As It Breaches SC Order: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
M’rashtra’s New Pension Scheme Not Applicable To Judicial Officers As It Breaches SC Order: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Bombay HC Slams M’rashtra Govt For Not Paying Pension, Arrears To Retd Judicial Officials [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Bombay HC Slams M’rashtra Govt For Not Paying Pension, Arrears To Retd Judicial Officials [Read Order]
Live Law![Bombay HC Slams M’rashtra Govt For Not Paying Pension, Arrears To Retd Judicial Officials [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Bombay HC Slams M’rashtra Govt For Not Paying Pension, Arrears To Retd Judicial Officials [Read Order]
Live Law
‘Pension cannot be denied without authority by law’
Hindustan TimesDiscover Related
















































