Sexual intent of the offender, not skin-to-skin contact, forms assault: Supreme Court
The HinduNovember 18, 2021 12:44 pm | Updated 09:46 pm IST - NEW DELHI The Supreme Court on Thursday quashed a Bombay High Court decision to acquit a man charged with assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act solely on the grounds that he groped the child over her clothes without ‘skin-to-skin’ contact. Comment | POCSO doesn’t brook dilution Section 7 mandates that “whoever with sexual intent touches the vagina, penis, anus or breast of the child or makes the child touch the vagina, penis, anus or breast of such person or any other person, or does any other act with sexual intent which involves physical contact without penetration is said to commit sexual assault”. Mr. Venugopal had argued that the High Court order would set a “very dangerous precedent” and cripple the intention of the POCSO Act to punish sexual offenders. On January 19, a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court’s Nagpur Bench created a furore by acquitting a man under the POCSO Act and holding that an act against a minor would amount to groping or sexual assault only if there was “skin-to-skin” contact.