Brothers Above 18 Years Of Age Not Eligible For Pensionary Benefits: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 3 months ago

Brothers Above 18 Years Of Age Not Eligible For Pensionary Benefits: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Madras High Court, in B. Senthil Kumar vs. The District and Sessions Judge, has held that pensionary benefits due to government servants cannot be given to their brothers and step-brothers above the age of 18 years.Senthil Kumar was nominated by his sister as legal heir in respect of the special provident fund, death-cum-retirement gratuity, general provident fund and had. The District and Sessions Judge, has held that pensionary benefits due to government servants cannot be given to their brothers and step-brothers above the age of 18 years. Kumar submitted a representation to the District and Session Judge praying for disbursement of pensionary benefits due to her sister who was a Grade-I Bench Clerk in Tamil Nadu Judicial Ministerial Services, by virtue of nomination and it was returned by stating that in view of Rule 48 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, he cannot be construed as family members and even otherwise he had crossed the age of 18 years. The division bench comprising of Justice M Sathyanarayanan and Justice J Nisha Banu agreed with the submission of the District Judge’s authority that denied Kumar the pensionary benefits of his deceased sister, that as per Sub Rule 5 of Rule 45 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, Kumar could not be considered as a family member unless at the time of nomination he was below the age of 18 years and admittedly that was not the case with Kumar.

History of this topic

Judge Who Resigned Also Entitled To Pension Benefits As Judge Who Retired : Bombay High Court
1 week, 1 day ago
Madras HC upholds compulsory retirement of district judge
3 weeks, 6 days ago
Persons Being Taken Care Of By Relatives Also Entitled To Claim Old Age Pension: Madras High Court
2 months ago
Madras High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 13 - May 19, 2024
10 months ago
Unjustified To Recover From Employees Any Excess Payment, In Case Of Inordinate Delay In Initiating The Recovery: Madras High Court
10 months, 1 week ago
[Compassionate Appointment] Family Pension Of Deceased Employee Need Not Be Considered Assessing Family's Income: Madras High Court
1 year, 2 months ago
Widowed Daughter Entitled to Dependent Pension Under Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme: HC
3 years, 7 months ago
Kerala HC Dismisses Challenge Against Compulsory Retirement Of Judicial Officer [Read Judgment]
5 years ago
Pension to freedom fighters not charity but honour conferred on them: Madras HC
6 years, 8 months ago
Madras HC Puts Interim Injunction On Penalty On Non-Maintenance Of Min Balance In Old-Age Pension Accounts [Read Order]
7 years, 4 months ago
Bombay HC Slams M’rashtra Govt For Not Paying Pension, Arrears To Retd Judicial Officials [Read Order]
8 years, 4 months ago
Bombay HC Slams M’rashtra Govt For Not Paying Pension, Arrears To Retd Judicial Officials [Read Order]
8 years, 4 months ago
Madras High Court slams ‘Heartless’ EPF officials [Read Order]
8 years, 8 months ago
Madras High Court slams ‘Heartless’ EPF officials [Read Order]
8 years, 8 months ago
Madras High Court rules that Second Wife has a legal right to pension [Read Judgment]
9 years, 8 months ago
Madras High Court rules that Second Wife has a legal right to pension [Read Judgment]
9 years, 8 months ago
Retirement Age Raise: Panacea for Pendency ?
11 years, 3 months ago
Madras HC dismissed petition to enhance HC and SC judges' retirement age
11 years, 5 months ago

Discover Related