Opponents want judge to declare Montana drag reading ban unconstitutional without requiring a trial
— A group of people, organizations and businesses opposed to a law that restricts drag performances and bans drag reading events at public schools and libraries asked a federal judge to declare Montana’s law unconstitutional without requiring a trial. “Motivated by an irrational and unevidenced moral panic, legislators took aim at drag performers and the LGBTQ+ community,” Upper Seven Law argued in its motion for a summary judgment filed late Tuesday. U.S. District Court Judge Brian Morris granted a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the law last month, saying it targets free speech and expression and that the text of the law and its legislative history “evince anti-LGBTQ+ animus.” “No evidence before the Court indicates that minors face any harm from drag-related events or other speech and expression critical of gender norms,” Morris wrote in the injunction. The state of Montana argued last week that the plaintiffs don’t have any legal claims to make because “the State Defendants have taken no action to enforce or implement,” the law and the plaintiffs haven’t suffered any harm.
Discover Related

Montana Supreme Court rules minors don’t need parental permission for abortion

Texas law banning some drag shows is unconstitutional, federal judge rules

Judge sides with youth activists in historic US climate crisis case

Montana Judge Temporarily Lifts Ban On Drag Performances Ahead Of Major Pride Event

Montana judge temporarily lifts ban on drag performances ahead of major Pride event

Montana LGBT+ advocates sue state over ‘Frankenstein’s monster’ drag ban

Federal judge overturns Tennessee’s ban on drag shows

Montana judge rules transgender sports rule unconstitutional
