Absence Of Motive Becomes Less Significant When Prosecution Relies On Strong Eyewitness Account: J&K High Court
Live LawUnderscoring the principle that the absence of a proven motive can be inconsequential if the eyewitness testimony is credible the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has clarified that the absence of motive becomes less significant when the prosecution relies on a strong eyewitness account. Meticulously examining the prosecution's evidence the bench noted several critical shortcomings key among these was the credibility of Maqsood Ahmed, described as a "chance witness" who had coincidentally been at the scene. Justice Dhar found Ahmed's testimony unreliable due to his inconsistent behaviour such as not immediately aiding his injured relative and not reporting the incident promptly to the authorities or anyone else. Further, the court observed that the investigating officer, who had recorded Gulzar Ahmed's statement implicating the appellants, failed to testify and added, “It was incumbent upon the SHO to step into the witness box and prove the statement of the injured recorded by him, particularly because during the trial of the case, the injured had passed away.