
Ernakulam District Commission Holds Flipkart Liable For Non-disclosure Of Seller Information As Mandated By E-Commerce Rules 2020
Live LawThe District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam bench comprising D.B. V and Mrs. Sreevidhia T.N held Flipkart liable for failure to disclose seller information, as mandated under Rule 5 of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020. Consequently, feeling aggrieved, the Complainant approached the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam, Kerala and filed a consumer complaint against Flipkart and Zest Money. Observations by the District Commission: The District Commission referred to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, and determined that Flipkart operates as a marketplace e-commerce platform, distinct from individual sellers. The District Commission found Flipkart in violation of Rule 5 of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, due to its failure to disclose seller information.
History of this topic

Consumer Protection Act Protects Interest Of Consumers In “Business To Consumer Disputes”, Not For “Business To Business Disputes”, District Commission Thrissur
Live Law
Consumer Protection Act 2019 | State Commission Can't Dismiss Compliant For Non-Prosecution, Obliged To Give Decision On Merits: Kerala HC
Live Law
Ernakulam District Consumer Commission Dismisses Complaint Against Indian Overseas bank For Delay In Disbursing Lottery Prize Money
Live Law
CONSUMER CASES WEEKLY ROUND UP: DECEMBER 16 – DECEMBER 22
Live Law
Unsolicited Calls Causing Annoyance Invade Privacy And Require Regulatory Action: Ernakulam District Commission
Live Law
Consumer Court Slaps Rs 10-K Cost On Flipkart For Refusal To Accept Return
ABP News
Consumer Cases Monthly Digest: June 2024
Live Law
Failure To Ship/Deliver Product Despite Receiving Payment, Bangalore District Commission Holds Flipkart Liable
Live Law
Intermediary Platforms Must Display Contact Details And Address Of Sellers, Hisar District Commission Holds Flipkart Liable
Live Law
Customer Is Responsible For Losses Caused By Their Negligence : Ernakulam District Commission Dismisses Complaint Against State Bank Of India
Live Law
Kozhikode District Commission Holds MyG Digital, LG India And Its Service Centre Liable For Withholding TV Sent For Repairs
Live Law
Kollam District Commission Holds Flipkart, Thomson Digital, Service Provider Liable For Selling Defective TV And Failure To Provide Replacement
Live Law
Consumer Cases Weekly Round-Up: 20th To 26th May 2024
Live Law
Consumer Cases Weekly Round-Up: 25th to 31st March, 2024
Live Law
Kerala State Commission Holds Kerala Chamber Of Commerce and Industry Liable For Unilateral Cancellation Of Home Buyer Agreement
Live Law
Matrimony.com Held Liable For Non-delivery And Loss Of Marriage Videos, Ernakulam District Commission Orders Refund, Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation
Live Law
Consumer Cases Weekly Round-Up: 26th February to 3rd March 2024
Live Law
Consumer Cases Monthly Digest: February 2024
Live Law
Phone Activated Before Purchase Date, Buyer Charged Twice For Handling, Chandigarh State Commission Holds Oneplus, Flipkart and Seller Liable
Live Law
Consumer Cases Weekly Round-Up; 22nd January To 4th February 2024
Live Law
Annual Digest of Consumer Cases 2023: Part-IV
Live Law
Cuttack District Commission Holds Flipkart Liable For Delivering Defective Cadbury Bourn Vita Product And Failing To Resolve Complainant's Concerns
Live Law
South Delhi District Commission Holds CarDekho.com Liable For Not Refunding Booking Amount, Directs To Pay Rs 20k Compensation
Live Law
Consumer Cases Weekly Round-Up: 25th December To 31st December 2023
Live Law
Ernakulam District Commission Holds M/S Flipkart Liable For Deficiency In Service
Live Law
Consumer Cases Weekly Round-up: 27th November to 3rd December 2023
Live Law
Bangalore District Commission Holds Flipkart Liable For Failure To Return After Cancellation Of Order Twice, Orders Refund And Compensation
Live Law
Gurdaspur Consumer Commission Holds Flipkart Liable For Delivering Empty Package, Ordered To Refund Rs.3,149 Along With Compensation
Live Law
Dharamshala District Commission Holds Harman International And Online Seller Liable For Deficiency In Service
Live Law
Fraudulent Electronic Transfer, Customer Not Liable, Bangalore District Commission Orders SBI To Refund, Pay Compensation And Legal Costs
Live Law
Consumer Cases Monthly Round-Up: October 2023
Live Law
Misuse Of Consumer Protection Act Can’t Be Allowed, Namakkal District Commission Imposes Rs. 20k Penalty On The Complainant For Filing Vexatious Complaint
Live Law
E-Commerce Platforms Must Ensure Availability Of Sellers’ Details For Awareness Of Consumers: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Consumer Cases Monthly Round-Up: September 2023
Live Law
Unilateral Cancellation Of Online Order Amounts To Unfair Trade Practice, Ganjam District Commission Holds Flipkart Liable
Live Law
Consumer Case Weekly Round-Up: 18th September 2023 – 23rd September 2023
Live Law
Intermediaries Liable For Defective Products, North-East Delhi Commission Orders Flipkart And Lenovo To Refund Phone Cost, Pay 15k For Mental Agony And 5k For Litigation Costs
Live Law
Refusal To Repair Defective TV And Issue Refund, Flipkart And TV Manufacturer Held Liable By Tiruvallur District Commission
Live Law
Flipkart Violates E-Commerce Disclosure Guidelines, Berhampur District Commission Orders Compensation Of Rs. 20,000 To Consumer
Live Law
Intermediary Not Required To Take Action Against Alleged Infringers On User’s Complaint Under Rule 3 Of IT Rules 2021: Delhi High Court
Live Law
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (South) Holds Dealer Liable For Selling Defective Goods.
Live Law
Flipkart & Its Sellers Jointly Liable For Charging Over MRP: District Consumer Forum
Live Law
Man Gets Wrong Product From Flipkart: Kerala High Court Directs Police To Redress His Grievance Within One Month
Live Law
Allahabad HC Grants Relief To Flipkart In A Case Over Sale Of Products In Violation Of Copyright Act
Live Law
CCI enquiry against Amazon, Flipkart cannot be crushed at initial stage: Karnataka HC
The Hindu
Explained: Government Proposes New E-commerce Rules, Here's What it Means for Consumers
News 18
Flipkart challenges Karnataka High Court order allowing Competition Commission of India investigation
The Hindu
SC stays order demanding Flipkart probe
Live Mint
E-tailers must solve complaints, ease returns under new law
Live MintDiscover Related













































