Madras High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 5 to August 11, 2024
Live LawCitations: 2024 LiveLaw 299 To 2024 LiveLaw 306 NOMINAL INDEX M Kathirvel v The Inspector General of Registration, 2024 LiveLaw 299 Kompress India Private Limited Versus Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw 300 NT Stalin Barathi v The District Collector, 2024 LiveLaw 301 P.Sibiga Dharshini v The District Collector and Another, 2024 LiveLaw 302 Suo Motu RC v Additional Superintendent of Police and Suo Motu RC v State, 2024 LiveLaw 303 Anitha R Radhakrishnan v The Directorate of Enforcement and another, 2024 LiveLaw 304 G Pandi v The District Collector and Others, 2024 LiveLaw 305 A Kamala v State and Others, 2024 LiveLaw 306 REPORT Madras High Court Strikes Down Section 77A Of Registration Act As Unconstitutional Case Title: M Kathirvel v The Inspector General of Registration Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 299 The Madras has held that the 2022 Amendment which introduced Section 77A to the Registration Act with respect to Tamil Nadu and gave powers to the District Registrar to cancel an instrument if it was found to be fraudulent or bogus was unconstitutional. Person Inviting Threat By His Criminal Or Anti-Social Activities Not Entitled To Police Protection: Madras High Court Case Title: NT Stalin Barathi v The District Collector Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 301 While rejecting a man's application for police protection, the Madras High Court recently observed that police protection should be granted only in appropriate cases, and granting police protection to a person who had invited a situation of threat due to his criminal or anti-social activities will be against public morality. Madras HC Quashes Loan Condition Seeking Apology From Applicant For Sticking Posters Against Bank, Says It's A Legitimate Mode Of Protest Case Title: P.Sibiga Dharshini v The District Collector and Another Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 302 The Madras High Court recently quashed a pre-release condition imposed by the Indian Overseas Bank asking a student to give an apology letter for circulating posters against the Bank while sanctioning her education loan. Madras High Court Forbids Deity's "Imprisonment", Says Temple Can't Be Sealed Citing Law & Order Without Allowing Customary Puja Case Title: G Pandi v The District Collector and Others Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 305 The Madras High Court recently expanded the scope of treating a deity as a juristic personality in law and held that when an idol in a temple is treated as a living person, closing the temple without allowing the customary pujas would amount to the deity's imprisonment.