Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: December 2024 [Citations 1305 - 1394]
Live LawCitations 2024 LiveLaw 1305 to 2024 LiveLaw 1394 NOMINAL INDEX DELHIVERY LIMITED versus STERNE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 2024 LiveLaw 1305 Panchhi Petha Store vs. Union Of India & Ors 2024 LiveLaw 1306 OVINGTON FINANCE PVT. Litigant's Conduct Trying To Protract Proceedings In Industrial Disputes Must Be Deprecated: Delhi High Court Imposes ₹20K Cost On Hospital Case Title: R B SETH JESSA RAM HOSPITAL BROS v. R B SETH JESSA RAM HOSPITAL WORKMEN UNION Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 1328 The Delhi High Court has recently deprecated the conduct of litigants trying to protract proceedings in industrial disputes which involve “extreme disparity of resources available to the rival litigants.” Laying Down Optical Fibre Cables To Enhance Communication Network For Defence Forces Is Exempt From Service Tax: Delhi High Court Case title: Telecommunications Consultants India Limited v. UoI & Ors. 'Resignation During Pendency Of Inquiry Or Investigation Is Generally Not Accepted', Delhi High Court Case Title: SATYAVIR SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 1368 A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur while dismissing the Petition of an Army Officer held that resignation during the pendency of inquiry or investigation could generally not be accepted regardless of whether the Petitioner was suspended or not. Termination Of Mandate Of Arbitral Tribunal Results In Waste Of Time, Resources And Money, Court Allowed Petition U/S 29A And Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court Case Title: M/S RCC INFRAVENTURES LTD & ORS v. M/S DMI FINANCE PVT LTD & ORS Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 1375 The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has held that the parties and the Arbitral Tribunal have invested a lot of time, effort and energy in the arbitral proceedings. 'Rejection Of Disability Pension Should Be Based On Reasoned Order ': Delhi High Court Case Title: EX U/NVK PRAVINDERA SHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 1388 A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur held that since the Petitioner's disabilities arose while he was in service, the possibility of the disabilities having arisen due to being in service could not be ruled out.