When FIR Omits Crucial Facts & They Are Added Later Through S.161 CrPC Statements, It Indicates Afterthought : Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court has held that subsequent mentioning of crucial facts, which the complainant could have stated at the time of lodging of the FIR itself, would raise doubts as it indicates an afterthought.The omission of crucial facts in the FIR cannot be supplemented through witness statements under Section 161 CrPC, the Court held. The Supreme Court has held that subsequent mentioning of crucial facts, which the complainant could have stated at the time of lodging of the FIR itself, would raise doubts as it indicates an afterthought. The omission of crucial facts in the FIR cannot be supplemented through witness statements under Section 161 CrPC, the Court held. Observing that nothing related to criminal force or assault was mentioned in the FIR, the Court said that the “contents of the statements recorded later under Section 161 of the CrPC clearly appears to be an afterthought as has happened in the present case.” The Court also noted that the written complaint only uses the expression of “creating obstruction”.