PC Act | Magistrate Can’t Make Declaration On Drawing Of Adverse Inference Against Accused For Refusing To Provide Voice Sample: Rajasthan High Court
Live LawThe Rajasthan High Court recently set aside observations of a magistrate regarding drawing of adverse inference against an accused, who refused to provide his voice sample at investigation stage, in a corruption case. "As far as the observation made by the learned Magistrate regarding unfavourable reckoning is concerned, wherein he has stated that the accused shall be responsible if any adverse inference would be taken by the trial Court during trial upon his refusal to provide voice sample, it is felt that the learned Magistrate has exceeded his jurisdiction and it was beyond his competence to make a declaration regarding drawing of an adverse inference against the accused," said the court. The competence of the Magistrate in taking voice sample before him during investigation has been recognized by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Ritesh Sinha," said the court. "In the considered view of this Court, the accused had a legal right to raise objection regarding competence of the Magistrate to take voice sample before him, along with other objections which were statutorily provided to him, therefore, by doing so, it cannot be held that his denial from providing voice sample may lead him to a situation where an adverse inference regarding voice match may be taken by the learned trial Court during the course of trial," said the court.