[NI Act] If Interest Is Claimed On Cheque Which Doesn't Include Interest Component, It Does Not Remain Legally Enforceable Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC
6 months ago

[NI Act] If Interest Is Claimed On Cheque Which Doesn't Include Interest Component, It Does Not Remain Legally Enforceable Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC

Live Law  

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that if interest is claimed on a cheque which does not include an interest component either by adjustments or by filling in the amount, the said cheque does not remain a legally enforceable debt or other liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.The Court quashed the complaint lodged under Section 138 NI Act,. The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that if interest is claimed on a cheque which does not include an interest component either by adjustments or by filling in the amount, the said cheque does not remain a legally enforceable debt or other liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. The Court said, "Given the statutory mandate of S. 82 of NI Act, before filing of the complaint in terms of S. 138 NIA, the moment the complainant receives the amount equal to the cheque amount, accepts it and admits receipt of the entire cheque amount, S. 82 switches on and triggers the discharge of the entire liability mentioned in such a cheque." A reading of Section 82 of the NI Act makes it crystal clear that given the statutory mandate, the moment the holder of the cheque accepts and admits the receipt of the entire cheque amount, the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stops applying because the dishonour of a cheque is punishable under S. 138 of NI Act only on the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability, the Court said.

History of this topic

Complainant's Burden Shifting Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: High Court Observation
1 month, 3 weeks ago
Discharge Of Debt By Drawer To Be Determined At Trial, Can't Be Ground For Quashing Cheque Bounce Case U/S 138 NI Act: Jharkhand HC
5 months, 1 week ago
Cheques Dishonored With Endorsements 'Insufficient Fund', 'Account Closed', 'Signature Mismatch' Attract S. 138 NI Act: Allahabad HC
6 months, 3 weeks ago
S.138 NI Act | Courts Can't Compel Complainant To Give Consent For Compounding, Mere Repayment Won't Absolve Accused : Supreme Court
7 months, 3 weeks ago
S.138 NI Act | Cause Of Action U/S 142(1)(B) Only Arises After Expiry Of 15 Days For Payment Of Amount: Allahabad High Court
9 months, 1 week ago
Notice Under S.138 NI Act Invalid If Omnibus Demand Is Made Without Specifying Cheque Amount : Supreme Court
11 months, 2 weeks ago
Section 138 NI Act| 'Notice Not Invalid If Other Amount Is Separately Indicated Therein Along With Cheque Amount': Allahabad High Court
1 year, 7 months ago
No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act If Cheque Is Presented For Full Amount Without Endorsing Part Payment Made By Borrower : Supreme Court
2 years, 2 months ago
Failure To Raise 'Probable Defence' Or Deny Issuance Of Cheque & Signature Thereupon Strengthens Presumption U/S 139 NI Act: Himachal Pradesh HC
2 years, 4 months ago
Undisputed Signatures On The Cheque In Itself Are Not Sufficient For Conviction Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Punjab And Haryana High Court
2 years, 6 months ago
Section 138 NI Act Attracted Even In Cases Where Debt Is Incurred After Cheque Is Drawn But Before Presentation: Supreme Court
3 years ago

Discover Related