Money Laundering Offence Attracted By Mere Possession Of Crime Proceeds ; Projection As Untainted Property Not Required : SC Interprets "And" In Sec 3 PMLA As "Or"
By interpreting "and" in Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 as "or", the Supreme Court held that mere possession or concealment of the proceeds of the crime is sufficient for the offence of money laundering and that it need not be projected as an untainted property. "Section 3 - Offence of money laundering - Whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money-laundering." Definition of money-laundering in Section 3 has wider reach The Bench noted that even from a reading of the original provision it is clear that the expression "money laundering" includes within its ambit every process and activity in dealing with the proceeds of crime, directly or indirectly, and not limited to the happening of the final act of integration of tainted property in to the formal economy to constitute an act of money-laundering. The Explanation inserted in Section 3 by way of the 2019 Amendment is as under - Explanation.--For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that,-- a person shall be guilty of offence of money-laundering if such person is found to have directly or indirectly attempted to indulge or knowingly assisted or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in one or more of the following processes or activities connected with proceeds of crime, namely:-- concealment; or possession; or acquisition; or use; or projecting as untainted property; or claiming as untainted property, in any manner whatsoever; the process or activity connected with proceeds of crime is a continuing activity and continues till such time a person is directly or indirectly enjoying the proceeds of crime by its concealment or possession or acquisition or use or projecting it as untainted property or claiming it as untainted property in any manner whatsoever. Involvement in any one of the "process or activity" would attract offence of money laundering 'Process or activity' in Section 3 includes concealment, possession, acquisition or use, projecting or claiming it as untainted property and involvement in any one of these activities would constitute the offence of money-laundering.





















Discover Related

₹42L assets attached in ₹8-cr post office fraud case in Jalandhar

Assessing Incidental Transactions In Financial Companies: A Taxation Conundrum

SDPI money laundering case: ED conducts raids at seven locations

Cash payments to foreign workers start of money laundering chain

Prosecutors take tough stance against bribers

Prevention Of Money Laundering Act (PMLA): All India Annual Digest 2024

HC faults ED for ‘mala-fide’ probe, slaps ₹1 lakh fine

Minister wants banks to team up against money laundering, despite privacy concerns

Himachal govt to set up STF to combat drug abuse, crime: CM

Centre grants sanction to ED to prosecute Kejriwal, Sisodia in money laundering case

Not filing charge sheets against officials without prior sanctions, says ED

Why is Singapore allowing police to take over people's bank accounts?

Goa cash-for-jobs scam: ED records statement of complainants, politics heats up

Bid to acquire ill-gotten gains not money laundering: Delhi Court

KTR gets interim protection from arrest till December 30 in Formula-E case

Business owners should not forget anti-money laundering rule currently in legal limbo
