Invalid Reassessment Notice, The Entire Proceedings have To Collapse: Calcutta High Court
Live LawThe Calcutta High Court has held that the foundation of a reassessment proceeding is a valid notice, and if the notice is held to be invalid, the entire edifice sought to be raised has to collapse. Therefore, the Assessing Officer held that these amounts were to be taxed separately at the Maximum Marginal Rate in terms of the proviso to Section 164. The assessee contended before the Tribunal that the CIT failed to take note of the material irregularity committed by the Assessing Officer while initiating proceedings under Section 148 for reopening assessment under Section 147 without noting the vital fact that the basis of issuing notice under Section 148 was on a wrong assumption of the fact that the assessee had invested money with its specified persons. The department contended that after the insertion of Explanation 3 to Section 147, even if the issue was not one of the reasons recorded while reopening the assessment, the Assessing Officer has the power to assess the escaped income on such other issues as come to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under Section 147. The court noted that Explanation 3, inserted by the amendment, empowers the assessing officer to assess the income in respect of any issue which has escaped assessment when such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under Section 147.