Supreme Court seems likely to rule for Ohio woman claiming job bias because she’s straight
Live MintWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed likely Wednesday to side with an Ohio woman who claims she suffered sex discrimination from her employer because she is straight. People alleging workplace bias have to show “background circumstances,” including that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence showing a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority group. His concession prompted Justice Neil Gorsuch to note, “We're in radical agreement on that today.” America First Legal and other conservative groups filed briefs arguing that members of majority groups are as likely to face job discrimination, if not more so, because of diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Lawyers for America First, founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller, wrote that the idea that discrimination against members of majority groups is rare "is highly suspect in this age of hiring based on ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion.’”
History of this topic
Straight woman’s ‘reverse discrimination’ Supreme Court case could upend decades of equality safeguards
The IndependentSupreme Court seems likely to rule for Ohio woman claiming job bias because she’s straight
Associated PressJudge upholds Ohio’s gender-affirming care ban; civil rights group vows immediate appeal
Associated Press
Iowa court upholds gender identity discrimination case
Associated Press
Supreme Court says gay, transgender workers protected by law
Associated Press
Justices rule LGBT people protected from job discrimination
Associated Press
US Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker protections
Al Jazeera
Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch calls LGBTQ workplace discrimination case ‘really close’
LA Times
Supreme Court to take up LGBT job discrimination cases
Associated Press
LGBT employment cases on road to Supreme Court
CNNDiscover Related
)
