"Whether Prosecution Sanction Required Even If Accused Was Not Holding The Office At The Time Of Taking Cognizance": Supreme Court Issues Notice In HD Kumaraswamy's Plea
Live LawThe Supreme court has issued notice in a Special Leave Petition filed by HD Kumaraswamy limited to the question as to whether without sanction the Special Judge could have taken cognizance of a complaint under Prevention of Corruption Act.Challenging the Karnataka High Court judgment which dismissed his petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the JD Leader. The Supreme court has issued notice in a Special Leave Petition filed by HD Kumaraswamy limited to the question as to whether without sanction the Special Judge could have taken cognizance of a complaint under Prevention of Corruption Act. Challenging the Karnataka High Court judgment which dismissed his petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the JD Leader had approached the Apex Court. Before the bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan and MR Shah, Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar, who appeared for Kumaraswamy, contended that, in view of the amendment made in Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2018, a sanction was required even though the petitioner was not holding the office at the time when the cognizance was taken.