Why Possibly Changing The Filibuster Brings Threats Of Political 'Nuclear' War
NPRWhy Possibly Changing The Filibuster Brings Threats Of Political 'Nuclear' War Enlarge this image toggle caption Alyssa Pointer/Pool/AFP via Getty Images Alyssa Pointer/Pool/AFP via Getty Images To a growing number of Democrats, the filibuster is a giant barrier to the things they want to accomplish. "And if all this takes eliminating the filibuster — another Jim Crow relic — in order to secure the God-given rights of every American, then that's what we should do," Obama said, instantly resetting the debate over the Senate procedure that allows a minority party with 41 votes to stop most legislation. Enlarge this image toggle caption Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images In 2013, Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid got rid of the filibuster for the Cabinet, other executive branch nominees and lower court judges. Sponsor Message A reporter followed up after Biden said he agreed with Obama's definition of the filibuster as "a relic of Jim Crow."