Alternative Remedy And Supervisory Jurisdiction Of High Courts Under Article 227 Of Constitution
Live LawRecently, a two judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment in which it observed that the availability of an appellate remedy in terms of the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure can be construed as a 'near total bar' for the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by High Courts.The principle that the power of. Recently, a two judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment in which it observed that the availability of an appellate remedy in terms of the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure can be construed as a 'near total bar' for the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by High Courts. The principle that the power of superintendence conferred by Article 227 is, to be exercised most sparingly and only in appropriate cases in order to keep the subordinate Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for correcting mere errors was settled by the five judges bench of the Supreme Court in Waryam Singh vs. Amarnath.. Perhaps, this is for the first time, that the Supreme Court has gone to the extent of using the phrase 'near total bar'. As one of its conclusion, the Court in Surya Deva Rai also had held: Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is exercised for keeping the subordinate courts within the bounds of their jurisdiction.