Procedural Impediments In Govt Machinery Not 'Sufficient Cause' For Condoning Delay In Filing Appeal U/S 37 Of Arbitration Act: Patna High Court
1 month, 3 weeks ago

Procedural Impediments In Govt Machinery Not 'Sufficient Cause' For Condoning Delay In Filing Appeal U/S 37 Of Arbitration Act: Patna High Court

Live Law  

The Patna High Court Bench of Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya has held that procedural impediments in the government machinery are not a 'sufficient cause' for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. However, the respondent argued that the appellants failed to assign the 'sufficient cause' of delay in filing the appeal on a day-to-day basis and stated the reason for the delay as primarily due to procedural delay as the file moves to headquarters and the department takes time in decision making and has to cross various stages and hence the administrative reason alone cannot be the reason for condoning the delay. Additionally, the court held that procedural impediments in the government machinery are not a 'sufficient cause' for condoning the delay. Ltd. Case Number: Miscellaneous Appeal No.679 of 2023 Counsel for the Appellants: Mr. Nadim Seraj, Advocate Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Afham Akhtar, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate Mr. Sourav Suman, Advocate Mr. Pragati Patra, Advocate Mr. Aalekhanand, Advocate Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate Date of Judgment: 08.01.2025 Click Here To Read/Download The Order

History of this topic

166 Days Delay In Re-Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned In Absence Of Genuine And Plausible Explanation: NCLAT
2 months ago
'Strength' Or 'Weakness' Of Case Cannot Justify Delay In Filing Appeal: Andhra Pradesh High Court
2 months, 1 week ago
Appellate Authority Has To Consider Grounds Raised In Appeal And Decide On Merits, Even If Appeal Is Heard Ex Parte: Patna High Court
3 months, 2 weeks ago
'Time Served On Duty Is Immaterial If Appointment Is Not As Per Law', Patna High Court
3 months, 3 weeks ago
Appeals Filed Without Delay Condonation Applications Cannot Be Rectified Later: Jharkhand High Court
7 months, 2 weeks ago
[Arbitration Act] General Explanation Of Intra-departmental Analysis And Discussions Doesn't Constitute Credible Explanation For Delay In Filing Appeal: Delhi High Court
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Arbitration Act | Misplacement Of File By Lawyer Not Sufficient Ground For Condoning 966 Days Delay: Allahabad High Court
9 months, 3 weeks ago
“Sufficient Cause” For Condoning Delay Requires Party To Have Acted Diligently And Without Negligence: NCDRC
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Employees Appointed On Ad Hoc Basis, Not Entitled To Salary Attached To A Post, Unless Appointed In A Substantive Capacity: Patna High Court
11 months, 2 weeks ago
Patna High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 08 To January 14, 2024
1 year, 2 months ago
Creation Of Special Authority No Reason To Condone Delay, Party Must Offer Explanation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
2 years ago
Data Shows Over 7 Lakh Cases Pending Due To Non Availability Of Counsel In Bihar; Patna High Court Calls Figures Alarming, Seeks Verified Data
2 years, 1 month ago
Can't Condone Delay If Applicant Fails To Show ‘Sufficient Cause’ For The Delay: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates
2 years, 1 month ago
Delay In Filing Appeal; Incorrect Particulars: Supreme Court Imposes Rs One Lakh Costs On UP Government For Casual Approach
2 years, 3 months ago
NCLAT Delhi Allows Appeal Re-Filed After 197 Days Of Delay, Subject To Cost Of Rs.10,000 Payable To Respondent
2 years, 6 months ago
Arbitration Cases Weekly Round-Up: June 19 – June 25, 2022
2 years, 8 months ago
Order Challenged Before Court Can't Be Justified By Producing Extra Material That Was Not Placed Before Adjudicating Authority: Patna High Court
3 years, 1 month ago
'No Explanation' : Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Condoning Delay Of 1011 Days In Filing Second Appeal
3 years, 3 months ago
Delay of More Than 120 Days In Filing Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 Cannot Be Condoned: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 3 months ago
SC Pulls Up M’rashtra Govt For ‘Casual’ Approach In Filing Delay Condonation Applications [Read Order]
7 years, 2 months ago
Litigant Needs To Be Vigilant, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 8 months ago
Litigant Needs To Be Vigilant, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 8 months ago
Govt. has to be a Model and Ideal Litigant; ‘Delay’ not to be condoned merely because the applicant is the State: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 8 months ago
‘Procedure’ is meant only to facilitate the administration of justice and not to defeat the same: Supreme Court [Read the Judgment]
9 years, 6 months ago

Discover Related