
Procedural Impediments In Govt Machinery Not 'Sufficient Cause' For Condoning Delay In Filing Appeal U/S 37 Of Arbitration Act: Patna High Court
Live LawThe Patna High Court Bench of Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya has held that procedural impediments in the government machinery are not a 'sufficient cause' for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. However, the respondent argued that the appellants failed to assign the 'sufficient cause' of delay in filing the appeal on a day-to-day basis and stated the reason for the delay as primarily due to procedural delay as the file moves to headquarters and the department takes time in decision making and has to cross various stages and hence the administrative reason alone cannot be the reason for condoning the delay. Additionally, the court held that procedural impediments in the government machinery are not a 'sufficient cause' for condoning the delay. Ltd. Case Number: Miscellaneous Appeal No.679 of 2023 Counsel for the Appellants: Mr. Nadim Seraj, Advocate Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Afham Akhtar, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate Mr. Sourav Suman, Advocate Mr. Pragati Patra, Advocate Mr. Aalekhanand, Advocate Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate Date of Judgment: 08.01.2025 Click Here To Read/Download The Order
History of this topic

166 Days Delay In Re-Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned In Absence Of Genuine And Plausible Explanation: NCLAT
Live Law
'Strength' Or 'Weakness' Of Case Cannot Justify Delay In Filing Appeal: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Live Law
Appellate Authority Has To Consider Grounds Raised In Appeal And Decide On Merits, Even If Appeal Is Heard Ex Parte: Patna High Court
Live Law
'Time Served On Duty Is Immaterial If Appointment Is Not As Per Law', Patna High Court
Live Law
Appeals Filed Without Delay Condonation Applications Cannot Be Rectified Later: Jharkhand High Court
Live Law![[Arbitration Act] General Explanation Of Intra-departmental Analysis And Discussions Doesn't Constitute Credible Explanation For Delay In Filing Appeal: Delhi High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Arbitration Act] General Explanation Of Intra-departmental Analysis And Discussions Doesn't Constitute Credible Explanation For Delay In Filing Appeal: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Arbitration Act | Misplacement Of File By Lawyer Not Sufficient Ground For Condoning 966 Days Delay: Allahabad High Court
Live Law
“Sufficient Cause” For Condoning Delay Requires Party To Have Acted Diligently And Without Negligence: NCDRC
Live Law
Employees Appointed On Ad Hoc Basis, Not Entitled To Salary Attached To A Post, Unless Appointed In A Substantive Capacity: Patna High Court
Live Law
Patna High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 08 To January 14, 2024
Live Law
Creation Of Special Authority No Reason To Condone Delay, Party Must Offer Explanation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Live Law
Data Shows Over 7 Lakh Cases Pending Due To Non Availability Of Counsel In Bihar; Patna High Court Calls Figures Alarming, Seeks Verified Data
Live Law
Can't Condone Delay If Applicant Fails To Show ‘Sufficient Cause’ For The Delay: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Delay In Filing Appeal; Incorrect Particulars: Supreme Court Imposes Rs One Lakh Costs On UP Government For Casual Approach
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi Allows Appeal Re-Filed After 197 Days Of Delay, Subject To Cost Of Rs.10,000 Payable To Respondent
Live Law
Arbitration Cases Weekly Round-Up: June 19 – June 25, 2022
Live Law
Order Challenged Before Court Can't Be Justified By Producing Extra Material That Was Not Placed Before Adjudicating Authority: Patna High Court
Live Law
'No Explanation' : Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Condoning Delay Of 1011 Days In Filing Second Appeal
Live Law![Delay of More Than 120 Days In Filing Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 Cannot Be Condoned: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Delay of More Than 120 Days In Filing Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 Cannot Be Condoned: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![SC Pulls Up M’rashtra Govt For ‘Casual’ Approach In Filing Delay Condonation Applications [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
SC Pulls Up M’rashtra Govt For ‘Casual’ Approach In Filing Delay Condonation Applications [Read Order]
Live Law![Litigant Needs To Be Vigilant, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Litigant Needs To Be Vigilant, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Litigant Needs To Be Vigilant, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Litigant Needs To Be Vigilant, Can’t Put Entire Blame On Advocate To Get Delay Condoned: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Govt. has to be a Model and Ideal Litigant; ‘Delay’ not to be condoned merely because the applicant is the State: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Govt. has to be a Model and Ideal Litigant; ‘Delay’ not to be condoned merely because the applicant is the State: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![‘Procedure’ is meant only to facilitate the administration of justice and not to defeat the same: Supreme Court [Read the Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
‘Procedure’ is meant only to facilitate the administration of justice and not to defeat the same: Supreme Court [Read the Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related
















































