IBC: NCLT Cannot Adjudicate Contractual Dispute If Termination Of Contract Is Based On Grounds Unrelated To Corporate Debtor's Insolvency: Supreme Court
3 years, 3 months ago

IBC: NCLT Cannot Adjudicate Contractual Dispute If Termination Of Contract Is Based On Grounds Unrelated To Corporate Debtor's Insolvency: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that the residuary jurisdiction of the NCLT cannot be invoked to adjudicate contractual dispute if the termination of a contract is based on grounds unrelated to the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor. 7 SCC 209 :: LL 2021 SC 142, it had injuncted a third party from terminating its contract with the corporate debtor because there were concurrent findings of the NCLT and NCLAT holding that the contract in question was the sole contract of the corporate debtor, and the termination of the contract by the third party was merely on the ground of initiation of CIRP without there being any contractual default on part of the corporate debtor. Thus, the residuary jurisdiction of the NCLT cannot be invoked if the termination of a contract is based on grounds unrelated to the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor The court further noted that there is nothing to indicate that the termination of the Facilities Agreement was motivated by the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor. "The NCLT does not have any residuary jurisdiction to entertain the present contractual dispute which has arisen dehors the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor.

Contract Supreme Court Jurisdiction Corporate Dispute Court Insolvency Gujarat Contractual Termination Nclt Nclat This Court Ibc Cirp Debtor Contractual Dispute Gujarat Urja  debtor  ibc  dispute  insolvency  unrelated  debtors  contractual  court  grounds  contract  supreme  nclt  jurisdiction  corporate  termination

History of this topic

Penalties U/S 65 Of IBC Can Be Imposed Against Those Who Fraudulently Initiate Insolvency Process: NCLAT
1 week ago

Penalties U/S 65 Of IBC Can Be Imposed Against Those Who Fraudulently Initiate Insolvency Process: NCLAT

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Barun Mitra and Arun Baroka disposed an appeal filed by a majority shareholder of the corporate debtor stating that the Section 7 application filed by financial creditors was fraudulently filed in collusion with the corporate debtors' promoters. NCLAT Judgement The National Company Law Appellate …

NCLT Doesn't Have Jurisdiction To Direct ED To Defreeze Corporate Debtor's Account Frozen Under PMLA: NCLT
1 week, 4 days ago

NCLT Doesn't Have Jurisdiction To Direct ED To Defreeze Corporate Debtor's Account Frozen Under PMLA: NCLT

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi bench comprising Justice Bachu Venkat Balaram Das and Atul Chaturvedi has held that the NCLT, which is the Adjudicating Authority under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 does not have the power to issue directions to the Directorate of Enforcement to defreeze the account of the Corporate Debtor when the account was frozen …

When Debt Is Not Unequivocally Admitted By Corporate Debtor, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Not Be Entertained: NCLAT
2 weeks, 5 days ago

When Debt Is Not Unequivocally Admitted By Corporate Debtor, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Not Be Entertained: NCLAT

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra and Mr. Arun Baroka has held that the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be entertained when the debt is not unequivocally admitted by the Corporate Debtor. The Operational Creditor issued a demand notice under section 8 of …

Pre-Existing Dispute Between Financial Creditor And Corporate Debtor Doesn't Bar Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Pre-Existing Dispute Between Financial Creditor And Corporate Debtor Doesn't Bar Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi bench comprising Chief Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and Avinash K. Srivatava has held that a pre-existing dispute between the Financial Creditor and Corporate Debtor does not bar a petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to be entertained. The Tribunal also held that a claim of the Financial Creditor which …

Pre-Existing Dispute Between Financial Creditor And Corporate Debtor Doesn't Bar Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Pre-Existing Dispute Between Financial Creditor And Corporate Debtor Doesn't Bar Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi bench comprising Chief Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and Avinash K. Srivatava has held that a pre-existing dispute between the Financial Creditor and Corporate Debtor does not bar a petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to be entertained. The Tribunal also held that a claim of the Financial Creditor which …

Economic Survey 2025: IBC nudging companies to resolve their distress early
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Economic Survey 2025: IBC nudging companies to resolve their distress early

Live Mint  

The Economic Survey 2024-25 lavished praise on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for transforming the behaviour of distressed companies, highlighting that the law has acted as a deterrent, encouraging many firms to resolve their financial distress early in order to avoid the consequences of a resolution process. they are resolving when default is imminent, on receipt of a notice for …

Withdrawal Of Liquidation Application Can Be Permitted When CoC Allows RP To File Application Seeking Extension Of CIRP Time Period: NCLAT
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Withdrawal Of Liquidation Application Can Be Permitted When CoC Allows RP To File Application Seeking Extension Of CIRP Time Period: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mita and Mr. Arun Baroka has held that when the CoC has already taken decision to file an application for extension of CIRP time period and granting permission to publish Form G for third time, withdrawal of liquidation application by Adjudicating Authority can be permitted. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed …

Insolvency Application Against Personal Guarantor Is Maintainable U/S 60(1) Of IBC Even If No CIRP Process Is Pending Against CD: NCLAT
1 month, 3 weeks ago

Insolvency Application Against Personal Guarantor Is Maintainable U/S 60(1) Of IBC Even If No CIRP Process Is Pending Against CD: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Arun Baroka has held that an application under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against the personal guarantor is maintainable before the NCLT under section 60 of the code even if no CIRP or Liquidation process is initiated or pending against the corporate debtor before the NCLT. …

Application U/S 95(1) Of IBC Against Personal Guarantor Not Maintainable In Absence Of CIRP Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor: NCLT Kolkata
2 months, 2 weeks ago

Application U/S 95(1) Of IBC Against Personal Guarantor Not Maintainable In Absence Of CIRP Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor: NCLT Kolkata

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata bench comprising Justice Bidisha Banerjee and Shri Balraj Joshi has held that an application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiating insolvency proceedings against a personal guarantor is not maintainable before the NCLT if no Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process or liquidation proceeding has been initiated or is pending against the …

Annual Digest Of IBC Cases: 2024
2 months, 2 weeks ago

Annual Digest Of IBC Cases: 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association vs. M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be absolved from its liability to discharge its Operational debt by the Insurance Company's payment to the Operational Creditor …

Pendency Of Proceedings Before NCLT For Approval Of Scheme Of Arrangement Does Not Preclude Financial Creditor From Filing Petition U/S 7: NCLAT
3 months ago

Pendency Of Proceedings Before NCLT For Approval Of Scheme Of Arrangement Does Not Preclude Financial Creditor From Filing Petition U/S 7: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra and Mr. Arun Baroka has held that the pendency of proceedings before the NCLT for approval of the scheme of arrangement does not preclude the Financial Creditor to proceed with Section 7 application. That the very fact that the Corporate Debtor during pendency of Section 7 application has …

IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]
3 months, 1 week ago

IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]

Live Law  

Nominal Index: Harsh Mehta Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India and Ors., WRIT PETITION NO. 737, 783 of 2024 Mr. Gajjala Yoganand versus Mr. Birendra Kumar Agarwal and Ors., IA No.373 of 2024 in CP No.296/7/HDB/2022 M/s Avani Towers Private Limited vs. M/s Energy Properties Private Limited, IA No. Related Party Can't Be Allowed Backdoor Entry Into CoC On …

NCLT Is Not Right Forum To Decide Whether Closure Of Factory Under Industrial Dispute Act Was As Per Law: NCLAT
3 months, 3 weeks ago

NCLT Is Not Right Forum To Decide Whether Closure Of Factory Under Industrial Dispute Act Was As Per Law: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra and Arun Baroka has held that the Adjudicating Authority is not the right forum to decide whether closure of the factory was in accordance with law. Liquidator vide e-mail dated 25.02.2019 asked the Appellants to submit the proof of employment in the company in the period of two years …

Property In Possession Of Corporate Debtor Sold When Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Was In Consideration Cannot Be Excluded From Assets: NCLAT
3 months, 3 weeks ago

Property In Possession Of Corporate Debtor Sold When Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Was In Consideration Cannot Be Excluded From Assets: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT Chennai bench of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain has held that property that is sold which was in possession of the corporate debtor immediately before the judgment in a petition under section 7 of the IBC was reserved cannot be excluded from the purview of the assets of the corporate debtor. An IA was filed by …

Sale Of Corporate Debtor As Going Concern Under Liquidation Regulations Takes Precedence Over Scheme Of Compromise U/S 230: NCLAT
4 months ago

Sale Of Corporate Debtor As Going Concern Under Liquidation Regulations Takes Precedence Over Scheme Of Compromise U/S 230: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT Chennai bench of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain affirmed that the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern under Regulations 32 & 32A of the Liquidation Regulations is more transparent and effective; therefore, the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern will have precedence, rather than resorting to the Scheme of Compromise …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd July 2024 To 28th July 2024
7 months, 2 weeks ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd July 2024 To 28th July 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | CIRP Of Holding Company Cannot Include Subsidiary's Assets: Supreme Court Case no. Insolvency Resolution Of Corporate Guarantor Won't Bar Creditor From Filing CIRP Against Corporate Debtor For Balance Debt : Supreme Court Case Title: BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. 313 of 2024 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr Barun …

Directing Corporate Debtor To Civil Courts Or Arbitration For Admitted Dues Undermines IBC Objectives: NCLT Mumbai
7 months, 2 weeks ago

Directing Corporate Debtor To Civil Courts Or Arbitration For Admitted Dues Undermines IBC Objectives: NCLT Mumbai

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai bench of Kuldip Kumar Kareer and Anil Raj Chellan had held that directing Corporate Debtor to seek resolution through civil courts or arbitration for even admitted dues would undermine the objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated against the Corporate Debtor by the National Company Law Tribunal, …

Half Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases : January To June,2024
8 months ago

Half Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases : January To June,2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | Moratorium Under S 14 No Bar To Execute Decree Against Directors/Officers Of Corporate Debtor: Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association vs. M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be …

NCLT Kochi: Creditors Can't Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantor Without Establishing Independent Default By CD
8 months, 2 weeks ago

NCLT Kochi: Creditors Can't Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantor Without Establishing Independent Default By CD

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kochi, comprising Justice T Krishna Valli and Mr. Shyam Babu Gautam dismissed the application to initiate insolvency proceedings against the Personal guarantors under Section 95 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It held that creditors cannot initiate insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors solely based on the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process without showcasing …

NCLT Asks IBBI To Incorporate Provisions In CIRP Regulations For Treating Transferred Winding-Up Cases
8 months, 3 weeks ago

NCLT Asks IBBI To Incorporate Provisions In CIRP Regulations For Treating Transferred Winding-Up Cases

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Principle Bench of Ramalingam Sudhakar and Avinash K. Srivastava has asked the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India to amend the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process regulations. This directive was issued by NCLT to address the handling of cases involving the winding up of companies that have been transferred to the NCLT under Section 433 of …

NCLAT Delhi: Section 95(1) Of IBC Permits Creditors To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Via A Resolution Professional
8 months, 3 weeks ago

NCLAT Delhi: Section 95(1) Of IBC Permits Creditors To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Via A Resolution Professional

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi bench, comprising Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Arun Baroka held that Section 95 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy, Code, 2016 allows creditors to initiate insolvency process against a Personal Guarantor through a Resolution Professional. Contention of the Appellant: The Appellant argued that since the default occurred on 04.03.2016, the Section 95 application filed …

CIRP Can Be Initiated Against The Corporate Debtor Despite Principal-Agent Relationship Between CD And Ultimate Client: NCLT Mumbai
10 months ago

CIRP Can Be Initiated Against The Corporate Debtor Despite Principal-Agent Relationship Between CD And Ultimate Client: NCLT Mumbai

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, comprising Mr. Kuldip Kumar Kareer and Mr. Anil Raj Chellan has held that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process can be initiated against a Corporate Debtor under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 even if the Corporate Debtor had been acting as an agent of an ultimate client or principal. Further, it …

NCLAT Delhi: Adjudicating Authority Can Extend Payment Timelines Under Resolution Plan Without Express Concurrence Of CoC
10 months ago

NCLAT Delhi: Adjudicating Authority Can Extend Payment Timelines Under Resolution Plan Without Express Concurrence Of CoC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Arun Baroka held that the Adjudicating Authority can extend payment timelines under the Resolution Plan without the express concurrence of the Committee of Creditors. NCLAT Verdict: The NCLAT New Delhi allowed the appeal and held that the Adjudicating Authority can extend payment timelines under the Resolution Plan …

Ambiguities In Uploading Of NCLT Orders, Requirement Of Enclosing Certified Copies With Appeal : Supreme Court Seeks IBBI Clarification
10 months, 1 week ago

Ambiguities In Uploading Of NCLT Orders, Requirement Of Enclosing Certified Copies With Appeal : Supreme Court Seeks IBBI Clarification

Live Law  

The Supreme Court issued notice to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, inter-alia, on the requirement to obtain a certified copy of the order and attach the same with the appeal. The Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta has issued notice considering that there is “considerable ambiguity” in certain issues concerning the service of the orders passed …

IBC Cases Quarterly Digest : January To March 2024
11 months, 1 week ago

IBC Cases Quarterly Digest : January To March 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association V M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be absolved from its liability to discharge its Operational debt by the Insurance Company's payment to the Operational Creditor …

IBC Revolutionizes Corporate Insolvency
11 months, 2 weeks ago

IBC Revolutionizes Corporate Insolvency

Deccan Chronicle  

Exactly, 10 years ago, in the run-up to the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, Narendra Modi, who was the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, had said that traders have more risk-taking capacity than soldiers. Several hundreds of companies and lakhs of employees have benefitted from a relatively easy resolution process devised by IBC.After seven years of IBC’s journey, corporate litigation and disputes …

NCLT Kolkata: Any Attachment Of Tainted Assets Of Corporate Debtor Before CIRP Commencement Would Always Be Available To Fulfill The Object Of IBC
11 months, 2 weeks ago

NCLT Kolkata: Any Attachment Of Tainted Assets Of Corporate Debtor Before CIRP Commencement Would Always Be Available To Fulfill The Object Of IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata, comprising Smt. Bidisha Banerjee, and Shri D. Arvind held that Any attachment of tainted assets of a Corporate Debtor before the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commencement would always be available to fulfill the object and goal of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. NCLT Verdict: The NCLT Kolkata allowed the CIRP application and held …

NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC
11 months, 2 weeks ago

NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata, comprising Smt. Bidisha Banerjee, and Shri D. Arvind held that the Provisional Attachment Order under PMLA will not bar the admission of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process proceedings against the Corporate Debtor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. NCLT Verdict: The NCLT Kolkata allowed the CIRP application and held that the Provisional Attachment Order …

Section 7 IBC Petition Can't Be Filed By Power Of Attorney Holder Unless Authorized By Board Resolution: NCLT Hyderabad
11 months, 3 weeks ago

Section 7 IBC Petition Can't Be Filed By Power Of Attorney Holder Unless Authorized By Board Resolution: NCLT Hyderabad

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Court-1, Hyderabad bench comprising Dr Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula and Shri Charan Singh held that a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be filed by a 'power of attorney' holder unless duly authorized by a Board Resolution. Additionally, the Corporate Debtor referred to a notification issued by the Central Government …

NCLT Kolkata: IBC Prevails Over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951
1 year ago

NCLT Kolkata: IBC Prevails Over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata, comprising Justice Ms. Bidisha Banerjee and Shri Arvind Devanathan held that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Mr. Rajesh Lahila was appointed as the Resolution Professional on 17.02.2022 to manage the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor and to take custody of all the assets of the Corporate …

NCLAT Delhi: Non-Grant Of Reliefs And Concessions By NCLT Does Not Have Any Adverse Effect On The Validity Of The Resolution Plan And Is Not Violative Of The Law
1 year ago

NCLAT Delhi: Non-Grant Of Reliefs And Concessions By NCLT Does Not Have Any Adverse Effect On The Validity Of The Resolution Plan And Is Not Violative Of The Law

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra held that non-grant of any reliefs and concessions by NCLT does not have any adverse effect on the validity of the Resolution Plan and is not a violation of the law. JAL and Manoj Gaur erstwhile Managing Director and personal guarantor of Corporate Debtor's loan …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 5th To 11th February 2024
1 year, 1 month ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 5th To 11th February 2024

Live Law  

NCLAT NCLAT Delhi: Adjudicating Authority Should Grant Extension Of Time To Consider Resolution Plan Crucial To Fulfill Object Of IBC Case Title: Nimai Gautam Shah, Resolution Professional of Sintex Plastics Technology Ltd. vs. RBL Bank Ltd. Case No. : Company Appeal No.82 of 2024 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra, and …

NCLT Kolkata: Simultaneous CIRP Can Be Initiated Against Principal Borrower And Corporate Guarantor
1 year, 1 month ago

NCLT Kolkata: Simultaneous CIRP Can Be Initiated Against Principal Borrower And Corporate Guarantor

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata comprising Smt. NCLT Verdict: The NCLT Kolkata admitted the CIRP application and held that a simultaneous CIRP can be initiated against Principal Borrower and Corporate Guarantor under IBC. In cases where the corporate person had offered guarantee in respect of loan transaction, the right of the financial creditor to initiate action against such entity …

IBC | Settlement In Section 7 Or Dropping Of Sec. 66 Proceedings Does Not Automatically End Proceedings Under Section 43: NCLT Mumbai
1 year, 1 month ago

IBC | Settlement In Section 7 Or Dropping Of Sec. 66 Proceedings Does Not Automatically End Proceedings Under Section 43: NCLT Mumbai

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, comprising of Shri Kuldip Kumar Kareer and Shri Anil Raj Chellan, has held that the proceedings under Section 43 of IBC would not automatically end against a party, if the parties enter settlement in Section 7 of IBC proceedings or proceedings under Section 66 of IBC are dropped. The Applicant was deleted from …

IBC | Inappropriate For NCLAT To Direct NCLT To Admit Petition Under Section 7 Without Evaluating Rival Contentions On Merits: Supreme Court
1 year, 2 months ago

IBC | Inappropriate For NCLAT To Direct NCLT To Admit Petition Under Section 7 Without Evaluating Rival Contentions On Merits: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has set aside an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal whereby the National Company Law Tribunal was directed to admit a petition under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, has held that it …

IBC | Statutory Set Off Or Insolvency Set Off Inapplicable To Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: Supreme Court
1 year, 2 months ago

IBC | Statutory Set Off Or Insolvency Set Off Inapplicable To Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has held statutory set off or insolvency set off is not applicable to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. “We would not extend it by implication, when the legislature has not accepted applicability of mutual set-off at the initial stage, that is, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process stage.” BACKGROUND FACTS In …

NCLAT Delhi: Once CIRP Has Stayed, Resolution Professional Can't Be Directed To Hand Over The Charge Of Corporate Debtor To Ex-Management
1 year, 2 months ago

NCLAT Delhi: Once CIRP Has Stayed, Resolution Professional Can't Be Directed To Hand Over The Charge Of Corporate Debtor To Ex-Management

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra allowed the appeals and held that RP cannot be directed to hand over the charge of Corporate Debtor to the Ex-management, once CIRP has stayed. NCLAT Verdict: The NCLAT New Delhi allowed the appeal and held that RP cannot be directed to …

NCLAT Delhi: Decisions To Liquidate Corporate Debtor By CoC U/S 33(2) Of IBC Must Be With Reasons And Cannot Be Done Arbitrarily
1 year, 2 months ago

NCLAT Delhi: Decisions To Liquidate Corporate Debtor By CoC U/S 33(2) Of IBC Must Be With Reasons And Cannot Be Done Arbitrarily

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra held that decisions of the Committee of Creditors to liquidate under Section 33 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 have to be with reasons and the liquidation cannot be decided arbitrarily. Background Facts: On 10.08.2023, the Adjudicating Authority admitted the application of …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th December 2023
1 year, 3 months ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th December 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | When Matter Heard But No Order Pronounced On The Same Day, Limitation To Commence From The Date When Order Gets Uploaded: Supreme Court Case Title: Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v Vistra ITCL Limited and Others Case No. : Civil Appeal Nos 7467-7468 of 2023 The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice of India Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, …

NCLT Hyderabad: Airport Authority Of India Being A Statutory Body Does Not Fall Within Scope Of 'Corporate Person' U/S 3(7) Of IBC
1 year, 3 months ago

NCLT Hyderabad: Airport Authority Of India Being A Statutory Body Does Not Fall Within Scope Of 'Corporate Person' U/S 3(7) Of IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, comprising of Smt. Bidisha Banerjee and Shri Arvind Devanathan has held that no proceedings can be initiated against the Airport Authority of India as it is a statutory body created under the Airport Authority of India Act, 1944, does not fall under the definition of 'corporate person' under Section 3 of Insolvency and …

NCLT Delhi: Application U/s 7 IBC Cannot Be Initiated Against A Struck-off Company; NCLT cant Suo Motu Restore The Name
1 year, 3 months ago

NCLT Delhi: Application U/s 7 IBC Cannot Be Initiated Against A Struck-off Company; NCLT cant Suo Motu Restore The Name

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi Bench, comprising of Manni Sankariah Shanmuga Sundaram and Dr Binod Kumar Sinha has held that any application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be initiated against a company struck off by Registrar of Company and the power to restore the name of such a company under section 252 of …

SC advises NCLT against routine asset revaluation orders
1 year, 3 months ago

SC advises NCLT against routine asset revaluation orders

Live Mint  

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has advised the National Company Law Tribunal against routinely issuing directions for a revaluation of a corporate debtor’s assets A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah emphasized that the tribunal has limited powers for such directions and should exercise them only in exceptional circumstances. Citing relevant provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the …

NCLT Kochi: Moratorium U/S 96 And 101 Of IBC Cannot Be Meant To Prohibit The Right To Action U/S 7, 9 Or 10 Of IBC
1 year, 4 months ago

NCLT Kochi: Moratorium U/S 96 And 101 Of IBC Cannot Be Meant To Prohibit The Right To Action U/S 7, 9 Or 10 Of IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Kochi Bench, comprising of Justice T Krishna Valli and Shri. Shyam Babu Gautam dismissed a stay application and has held that the moratorium under sections 96 and 101 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code “ cannot be meant to prohibit the right to action under sections 7, 9 or 10 of IBC as it lies …

NCLAT New Delhi: Jurisdiction Of NCLT Under IBC Is Summary In Nature, Not Extensive As A Civil Court To Enquire Into Disputes
1 year, 4 months ago

NCLAT New Delhi: Jurisdiction Of NCLT Under IBC Is Summary In Nature, Not Extensive As A Civil Court To Enquire Into Disputes

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi comprising of Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra dismissed an appeal filed by Vistra ITCL Ltd.. It held that the scope and jurisdiction of National Company Law Tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 being summary in nature is distinctly not as extensive as that of a …

NCLAT New Delhi: No Point In Discussing An Issue, Even If Issue Is Attractive, After The Closure Of CIRP Proceedings
1 year, 5 months ago

NCLAT New Delhi: No Point In Discussing An Issue, Even If Issue Is Attractive, After The Closure Of CIRP Proceedings

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi comprising of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain and Naresh Salecha, dismissed the appeal filed in State Bank of India vs. Ritesh Prakash Adatiya & Ors. The appeal was filed against the order dated 29.03.2023 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata whereby an application by the IRP of McLeod Russel …

Mere Statement Of Operational Creditor That No Dispute Exists, Is Not Enough : NCLAT Delhi
1 year, 5 months ago

Mere Statement Of Operational Creditor That No Dispute Exists, Is Not Enough : NCLAT Delhi

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Shri Barun Mitra, while adjudicating an appeal filed in NTT Data Business Solutions Pvt. When disputes arose between the Parties, the Corporate Debtor issued a notice invoking arbitration dated 14.06.2021 to the Operational Creditor, under Section 21 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Subsequently, the …

NCLAT New Delhi: Disputes Surrounding Claims And Counter-Claims Cannot Be Adjudicated Or Determined By The Adjudicating Authority Given Their Summary Jurisdiction
1 year, 5 months ago

NCLAT New Delhi: Disputes Surrounding Claims And Counter-Claims Cannot Be Adjudicated Or Determined By The Adjudicating Authority Given Their Summary Jurisdiction

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Barun Mitra, dismissed the appeal filed in Rakesh Kumar vs. The appeal has been preferred by Rakesh Kumar of Suchi Paper Mills Ltd. against the National Company Law Tribunal New Delhi’s order admitting the Corporate Debtor into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th September 2023
1 year, 6 months ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th September 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Tata Power Western Odisha Distribution Limited & Anr. V Jagannath Sponge Private Limited Citation: 2023 LiveLaw 788 The Supreme Court has held that under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, once the Resolution Plan stands approved by the National Company Law Tribunal, the Electricity Department cannot demand payment of arrears, which were payable by the Corporate …

NCLT Proceeded Ex-Parte Against CD On First Hearing After Notice, NCLAT Delhi Says Sufficient Opportunity Not Given As Per Rule 37(2) Of NCLT Rules
1 year, 6 months ago

NCLT Proceeded Ex-Parte Against CD On First Hearing After Notice, NCLAT Delhi Says Sufficient Opportunity Not Given As Per Rule 37(2) Of NCLT Rules

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Shri Barun Mitra and Shri Arun Baroka, while adjudicating an appeal filed in Ami Ashutosh Majumdar v Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. The NCLT had proceeded ex-parte against the Corporate Debtor on the first hearing held post issuance of notice and when the time period to file …

NCLT Delhi Upholds Termination Of Related Party Agreements By Resolution Professional With Coc’s Consent
1 year, 7 months ago

NCLT Delhi Upholds Termination Of Related Party Agreements By Resolution Professional With Coc’s Consent

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, comprising of Shri Bachu Venkat Balaram Das and Shri L.N. Gupta, while adjudicating a petition filed in India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v M/s Medirad Tech India Limited, has upheld the termination of Related Party agreements by the Resolution Professional since the Committee of Creditors had given ‘No Objection’ for such …

Discover Related