‘Scanty, Sketchy Evidence’: Disha Ravi Gets Bail in Toolkit Case
The QuintAfter summarising the key contentions of the parties, the judge states that: “The nub of the issue is whether applicant/accused Disha was merely involved in peaceful protest and dissent against the farm acts or she was actually involved in seditious activities under the guise of protesting against the said legislation.” Referring to the Supreme Court’s landmark Kedar Nath Singh judgment on sedition, he then points out that ‘violence’ is essential to satisfy an accusation of sedition under Section 124A of the IPC. As conceded by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, there is no direct evidence to establish the link between Ravi and the violence which took place in Delhi on 26 January. At the same time, the Delhi Police claim that the ‘circumstances’ showed there was a ‘larger conspiracy’ to perpetuate violence by secessionist forces. However, the judge notes that the Bombay High Court has previously held that “conspiracy cannot be proved merely on the basis of inferences.