
Revisiting a verdict
The HinduThe Supreme Court's 1973 verdict in Kesavananda Bharati and the debate on the basic structure doctrine continue to fascinate observers. One, he disputes the general belief that the Supreme Court held in the Kesavananda case that Article 368 does not enable Parliament to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution. However, many observers, including Andhyarujina, consider that in Kesavananda, Justice Khanna did not share the Sikri-led judges' emphasis on treating the fundamental rights as unamendable basic features of the Constitution. Irrespective of such inconsistencies, it is possible to suggest that Justice Khanna decided to identify himself with the Sikri-led judges on the question of the fundamental rights being a part of the basic structure in view of Indira Gandhi's blatant abuse of constitutional provisions to keep her in office. To Andhyarujina's surprise, subsequent Benches of the Supreme Court accepted this clarification of Justice Khanna rather than what the plain reading of the Kesavananda judgments would suggest.
History of this topic

When justice runs in veins
New Indian Express
Article 370 to Arvind Kejriwal bail: Justice Sanjiv Khanna's defining judgments
India Today
Kesavananda Bharati Judgment Played A Pivotal Role In Developing Socio-Economic Justice, Independence Of Judiciary : Justice BR Gavai
Live Law
50th anniversary of Kesavananda Bharati verdict: SC dedicates web page
Deccan Chronicle
Kesavananda Bharati case | SC creates webpage to host petitions, judgments of the historic 1973 Fundamental Rights case
The Hindu
Kesavananda Bharati case: SC creates special web page on 50th anniversary
Hindustan Times
In Indian Constitution vs Collegium Debate, Can the Govt & Judiciary Reconcile?
The Quint
Extraordinary Attack On Judiciary: Cong On Dhankar Questioning 1973 Kesavananda Bharati Verdict
ABP News
1973: Kesavananda Bharati case
The Hindu
How Kesavananda Bharti vs State of Kerala led to basic structure doctrine
Op India
Kesavananda Bharati — the petitioner who saved democracy, but lost his case in Supreme Court
The Hindu
Kesavananda Bharati Judgment: An Exporter of Constitutional Ideas
Live Law
Remembering Justice H R Khanna On The 44th Anniversary Of ADM Jabalpur Verdict
Live Law
Abhishek Manu Singhvi says verdict from SC ‘best solution’ to Ayodhya debate after five-judge Constitution Bench reserves judgment
Firstpost
‘How Can You Disagree With Your Father’, CJI to AG During The Aadhaar Hearing on Tuesday
Live Law
Justice (Rtd) Karnan Judgment: Did SC Miss the Main Issue?
Live Law
Justice (Rtd) Karnan Judgment: Did SC Miss the Main Issue?
Live Law
2nd Justice H.R. Khanna Memorial Essay Competition (June 2017)
Live Law
Senior Advocate, K.K.Venugopal Urges Revisiting Kesavananda Bharati, Makes Harish Salve Shudder At The Idea
Live Law
Senior Advocate, K.K.Venugopal Urges Revisiting Kesavananda Bharati, Makes Harish Salve Shudder At The Idea
Live Law
The review that wasn't: Forty years after Kesavananda Bharati vs the State of Kerala
Firstpost
Kesavanda Bharthi Judgment safeguards the idea of India.
Live Law
Plea For Review Of Verdict On Judges Appointment Sent To CJI
India TV NewsDiscover Related














































