
Time Spent To Defend Reassessment Notice Issued Without Following Procedure Doesn't Extend Limitation For Revenue When Issuing Fresh Notice: Delhi HC
Live LawThe Delhi High Court has held that if the Revenue issues a reassessment notice to an assessee under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without following due procedure, it cannot later issue fresh reassessment notice beyond the prescribed period, claiming that time spent on earlier litigation is to be excluded for the purposes of computing limitation. A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed, “Notice issued under Section 148 of the Act in the earlier round was set aside on the ground that the AO had not followed the mandatory requirement of seeking an approval from the competent authority…The fact that the Revenue had not taken the steps in accordance with law cannot possibly be construed as a factor in favour of the Revenue for extending the limitation.” The Petitioner had challenged the reassessment notice issued to it as being time-barred. Section 149 prescribes that the maximum period within which notice under Section 148 of the Act could have been issued is six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. On the question of stay order, Court said there was no order impeding the Revenue from issuing another notice to the assessee within the prescribed time.
History of this topic

Not An Enabling Provision, Proscribes Reassessment Action Beyond Limitation: Delhi HC Explains Timelines U/S 149 Of Income Tax Act
Live Law
What Is The Time Period Surviving U/S 149 Of Income Tax Act For Issuing Reassessment Notices: Delhi High Court Explains
Live Law
Department Cannot Invoke Extended Period Of Limitation Merely Because Returns Were Self-Assessed: CESTAT
Live Law
Briefing Standing Counsel, Obtaining Approvals From Officials Not 'Sufficient Cause' For Condoning Delay In Filing Appeal: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Assessee Must Clearly Establish 'Movement Of Goods' To Defend Allegations Of Accommodation Entries: Delhi HC
Live Law
Adjudicating Authority's Inaction To Dispose Of Proceedings Can't Be Attributed To Taxpayer In Absence Of Any Malice On His Part: Bombay HC
Live Law
Time Spent In Bona Fide Proceedings Before Court Without Jurisdiction To Be Excluded When Considering Objection On Limitation In S.11 Plea: Delhi HC
Live Law
Reopening Notice Issued U/s 148 Merits To Be Quashed If Barred By Limitation Period Prescribed U/s 149: Jharkhand High Court
Live Law
Period Spent In Disposal Of Appeal Before CESTAT Shall Not Be Counted Towards Period Stipulated Under Section 28 (9) Of Customs Act: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Under Section 34(3) Of The A&C Act, The Limitation Period Of 3 Months Plus 30 Days In Inelastic And Inflexible: Delhi High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Assessee Can't Indefinitely Seek Time In Response To SCN: Kerala High Court
Live Law
Statutory Appeal Period Under Customs Act, Appellate Authority Has No Power To Condone Delay: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Delay In Filing Of Appeal Under Section 42 Of IBC Is Condonable Under Section 5 Of Limitation Act: NCLAT Delhi
Live Law
No Justification For Not Adjudicating The Notice For More Than 13 Years After Its Issuance: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Reassessment Notices Issued After Elapse Of Six Years: Gujarat High Court Quashes Assessment
Live Law
Reassessment Notices Issued Between 1st April 2021 To 30th June, 2021 Not Time Barred: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Issuance Of Notice And Initiation Of Reassessment Proceeding Beyond 6 Years: Calcutta High Court Stays Proceedings
Live Law![HC Cannot Disregard Statutory Limitation Period To Entertain Writ Petition Challenging Order Passed By Statutory Authority: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
HC Cannot Disregard Statutory Limitation Period To Entertain Writ Petition Challenging Order Passed By Statutory Authority: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![[Consumer Protection Act] Mere Service Of Notice On Opposite Party Without Complaint Copy Cannot Be Commencing Point Of 30 Days Limitation To File Reply: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Consumer Protection Act] Mere Service Of Notice On Opposite Party Without Complaint Copy Cannot Be Commencing Point Of 30 Days Limitation To File Reply: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Affidavit For Admission/Denial Of Documents in Commercial Suits Must Be Filed Within 45 Days: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Affidavit For Admission/Denial Of Documents in Commercial Suits Must Be Filed Within 45 Days: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![No Absolute Rider To Deposit Entire Maintenance Amount Prior To Entertainment Of Statutory Remedy: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No Absolute Rider To Deposit Entire Maintenance Amount Prior To Entertainment Of Statutory Remedy: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![No Absolute Rider To Deposit Entire Maintenance Amount Prior To Entertainment Of Statutory Remedy: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No Absolute Rider To Deposit Entire Maintenance Amount Prior To Entertainment Of Statutory Remedy: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Sales Tax; Time for assessment cannot be extended when the assessment has already become time barred: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Sales Tax; Time for assessment cannot be extended when the assessment has already become time barred: SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related






































![[Arbitration Act] Limitation Does Not Stop If Initial Filing Is Non Est, Date Of Filing Must Be Reckoned From Date Of Refiling: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)



![[CGST ACT] Dept Can't Seize Goods If Quantity Or Weight Of Goods Is Found Correct On Physical Verification: Calcutta High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)


![[S.292B Income Tax Act] Inadvertent Mistakes In Reassessment Can Be Saved But Assessment Order Overlooking Apparent Error Cannot: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)


