Proof That Offence Was Committed Only Because Victim Was SC-ST Member Necessary To Sustain Conviction U/s 3(2)(v) SC-ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act: SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawIn order to sustain a conviction under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, it must be proved that the offence was committed only on the ground that the victim was a member of the Scheduled Caste, the Supreme Court has reiterated.The bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice AS Bopanna set aside the conviction of the accused. In order to sustain a conviction under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, it must be proved that the offence was committed only on the ground that the victim was a member of the Scheduled Caste, the Supreme Court has reiterated. The bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice AS Bopanna set aside the conviction of the accused under the SC-ST Act on the ground that there is nothing to suggest that the offence was committed by the accused only because the deceased belonged to a Scheduled Caste. In this case, both the trial court and the High Court recorded the finding that the accused scolded the deceased that he belongs to "Khangar" Caste and how he could drive away the cattle of the person belonging to "Thakur" Caste and therefore, thus concluded that the accused has committed the offence under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.